Feeds

DWP loses £2.5bn to fraud and errors

IT fails to alleviate loss

High performance access to file storage

About £2.5bn was lost to fraud and error in benefit payments over the last year, according to the National Audit Office (NAO).

The figure is down from £2.7bn over the Department for Work and Pensions' (DWP) previous financial year, but was still deemed too high for the NAO. Consequently, the watchdog refused to sign off the accounts – the 18th consecutive year in which this has happened.

Publishing the report, DWP Resource Accounts 2006-07, NAO head Sir John Bourn said: "Once again I have had to qualify my opinion on the DWP accounts because of the significant sums lost to fraud and error: 2.5bn or 2.1 per cent in the last year."

The report identifies limited IT integration as one reason for the high level of error, as well as complex benefits rules, poor business process design and human mistakes.

However, Bourn accepted that progress had been made in introducing new systems and procedures to reduce fraud and error and improve the recording of identified debts.

The report acknowledges a number of anti-fraud initiatives adopted by the DWP, including advanced data matching and comparing data from government and external sources.

It adds: "There are plans to further develop data matching using advanced IT systems, which will allow more timely identification of fraud and error and, in particular, help to target organised fraud rings."

In 2005, the DWP introduced its Debt Manager IT system to help cleanse data and put in place processes to support the valuation of overpayment debts recorded in its balance sheet.

Commenting on this project, Bourn remarked: "Work by my staff has confirmed that this has been done well and provides a sound basis for the future."

This article was originally published at Kablenet.

Kablenet's GC weekly is a free email newsletter covering the latest news and analysis of public sector technology. To register click here.

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Android engineer: We DIDN'T copy Apple OR follow Samsung's orders
Veep testifies for Samsung during Apple patent trial
One year on: diplomatic fail as Chinese APT gangs get back to work
Mandiant says past 12 months shows Beijing won't call off its hackers
Big Content goes after Kim Dotcom
Six studios sling sueballs at dead download destination
Alphadex fires back at British Gas with overcharging allegation
Brit colo outfit says it paid for 347KVA, has been charged for 1940KVA
Jack the RIPA: Blighty cops ignore law, retain innocents' comms data
Prime minister: Nothing to see here, go about your business
Singapore decides 'three strikes' laws are too intrusive
When even a prurient island nation thinks an idea is dodgy it has problems
Banks slap Olympus with £160 MEEELLION lawsuit
Scandal hit camera maker just can't shake off its past
France bans managers from contacting workers outside business hours
«Email? Mais non ... il est plus tard que six heures du soir!»
Reprieve for Weev: Court disowns AT&T hacker's conviction
Appeals court strikes down landmark sentence
US taxman blows Win XP deadline, must now spend millions on custom support
Gov't IT likened to 'a Model T with a lot of things on top of it'
prev story

Whitepapers

Mainstay ROI - Does application security pay?
In this whitepaper learn how you and your enterprise might benefit from better software security.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Mobile application security study
Download this report to see the alarming realities regarding the sheer number of applications vulnerable to attack, as well as the most common and easily addressable vulnerability errors.