Feeds

Programming constructs in BPEL

Part 3: BPELJ and Compensation

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

The first thing to note in this script is the two attributes for the whole process at the start. These are used to define the default expression language (which in this case is Java) and the default package (bpelj:package="com.regdev.example") that should be used with any emebedded Java code within the script. That is, all Java code should be considered to be part of the com.regdev.example package.

Next, note that the <partnerLinks> section includes a partner link to a "lookup" resource. This is actually a Java class, such as an EJB, that will be used elsewhere within the script.

In the variables section, a new variable message is defined as a type defined by a class TextMessage within a package com:.regdev.

Later in the script, a Java snippet can be seen. A Java snippet contains valid Java expressions or statement blocks. These blocks are embedded in a BPEL process definition and have access to certain variables defined within the execution space of the script (in a similar manner to the way in which JSPs can contain embedded Java code that can access certain variables within a JSP).

Finally, an invoke section illustrates how a method is invoked on a Java class. In this case the method checkRegistration on the class indicates by the partner link referenced by BookLookup (i.e. com.regdev.BookLookup). The method checkRegistration takes two parameters a (book) title and an isbn.

BPELJ - is this the right answer?

In an earlier column, I indicated that BPEL represented Programming in the Large, whereas programming languages such as Java represent Programming in the small. I am left wondering whether there's a fundamental dichotomy between the two approaches. Is it really appropriate to define business functions in Java within a BPEL definition? Does this promote the flexibility claimed for BPM and the use of BPEL?

If we look at the implementation of BPELJ, I'm again left wondering about the success of the final result. The intention, as mentioned earlier, was to use the strengths of both to provide something that is more than the sum of its parts. However, we end up with a syntax that is less than "clean", in my opinion, as a programming language (notably, a criticism I've also been levelling at JSPs for years). Embedding Java within BPEL Java snippets might work well if there was a development tool hiding the details, but in its raw form it's hamstrung by embedding it in an XML-based pseudo-programming language.

Compensation

The idea behind compensation is that in any long running business process, situations may occur in which it's necessary for the whole business process to be terminated tidily. However, within such business processes, the systems being integrated tend to be asynchronous in nature. They may represent both new and legacy applications, may or may not have the ability to rollback any side affects of any services executed etc.

In such situations, when a business process must be terminated, it may be necessary to communicate with one or more systems that have previously completed their activities, in order to tell them to undo what they've done. The goal of compensation is to support the reversal of the effects of previous activities that have been carried out as part of the process now being terminated.

Compensation overview

Having read the introduction, perhaps you are thinking, so what exactly is compensation? I find it useful to think of compensation being used in the following scenario for a holiday booking business process:

To book a holiday we might create a business process that defined three specific steps:

  1. Booking a hotel
  2. Booking a hire car
  3. Booking a flight

In such a scenario compensation behaviour might be defined for each of these steps such that if the hotel and the hire car are booked but a flight cannot be found then the hire car and the hotel booking can be undone - this undoing process is compensation.

In practice, compensation has two parts a compensation handler and a compensate activity. A compensation handler is associated with a "scope". A scope is a container and context for other activities (you might considered it to be analogous to a {}block in Java). For example, the "Booking a Hotel" step above could be a scope. Indeed, the above example could be considered to have three scopes, one for each booking. Thus, each scope would have its own compensation process defined for it. The compensation process is referred to as the "compensation handler" and defines how the compensation is implemented (i.e. how the undo behaviour should be performed).

The compensation handler can also be invoked indirectly by a compensate activity. When this happens the compensation handler is invoked on an inner scope activity that has already successfully completed, and it can be invoked only from within a fault handler or another compensation handler.

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
UNIX greybeards threaten Debian fork over systemd plan
'Veteran Unix Admins' fear desktop emphasis is betraying open source
Netscape Navigator - the browser that started it all - turns 20
It was 20 years ago today, Marc Andreeesen taught the band to play
Redmond top man Satya Nadella: 'Microsoft LOVES Linux'
Open-source 'love' fairly runneth over at cloud event
Google+ goes TITSUP. But WHO knew? How long? Anyone ... Hello ...
Wobbly Gmail, Contacts, Calendar on the other hand ...
Chrome 38's new HTML tag support makes fatties FIT and SKINNIER
First browser to protect networks' bandwith using official spec
Admins! Never mind POODLE, there're NEW OpenSSL bugs to splat
Four new patches for open-source crypto libraries
Torvalds CONFESSES: 'I'm pretty good at alienating devs'
Admits to 'a metric ****load' of mistakes during work with Linux collaborators
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.