Feeds

Fooling around at the less glamorous end of mobility

What is sexy?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

Mobile workshop We spent some time last week discussing requirements for mobile devices and got quite a bit of feedback on how to select and deploy the right kit for professional users.

This culminated in a poll towards the end of the week in which we learned, perhaps not surprisingly, that while many with smaller installations offer their users quite a bit of freedom, things need to be more controlled when you get beyond a user base of about 10.

At this point, the usual practice seems to be to define a series of standard devices which are used for business purposes. These may then be used to offer users choice in a more controlled manner (more common for mid-sized installations) or allocated to specific job roles and issued very prescriptively (the approach favoured for larger scale deployments).

We'll issue a report with some of the specific numbers included at some point soon, but in the meantime we want to turn our attention to the less glamorous end of mobility – using mobile technology to introduce efficiencies into more "blue collar" areas such as field service management and logistics.

We know from the survey we conducted earlier in the month that quite a few of you are active in this area, but the big question we have is whether you should think of this as separate to dealing with the needs of the professional white collar contingent.

Should you, for example, be looking to put separate solutions or infrastructure in place for mobile email on the one hand and access to your SAP system or similar on the other, or is it sensible to look for a platform and management framework that can deal with both?

At a higher level, we could even ask whether any of the mobile stuff should be separate to your existing middleware, security, and management framework anyway, and if not, in which areas is it particularly important to be properly integrated or coordinated.

So, if you have grappled with these or related questions before, we'd be really interested in hearing about your thoughts and experience, and particularly any advice you have for others trying to make decisions in this area. You can give us your feedback as a comment below. ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
TEEN RAMPAGE: Kids in iPhone 6 'Will it bend' YouTube 'prank'
iPhones bent in Norwich? As if the place wasn't weird enough
Consumers agree to give up first-born child for free Wi-Fi – survey
This Herod network's ace – but crap reception in bullrushes
Crouching tiger, FAST ASLEEP dragon: Smugglers can't shift iPhone 6s
China's grey market reports 'sluggish' sales of Apple mobe
Sea-Me-We 5 construction starts
New sub cable to go live 2016
EE coughs to BROKEN data usage metrics BLUNDER that short-changes customers
Carrier apologises for 'inflated' measurements cockup
Comcast: Help, help, FCC. Netflix and pals are EXTORTIONISTS
The others guys are being mean so therefore ... monopoly all good, yeah?
Surprise: if you work from home you need the Internet
Buffer-rage sends Aussies out to experience road rage
EE buys 58 Phones 4u stores for £2.5m after picking over carcass
Operator says it will safeguard 359 jobs, plans lick of paint
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.