Feeds

Fooling around at the less glamorous end of mobility

What is sexy?

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Mobile workshop We spent some time last week discussing requirements for mobile devices and got quite a bit of feedback on how to select and deploy the right kit for professional users.

This culminated in a poll towards the end of the week in which we learned, perhaps not surprisingly, that while many with smaller installations offer their users quite a bit of freedom, things need to be more controlled when you get beyond a user base of about 10.

At this point, the usual practice seems to be to define a series of standard devices which are used for business purposes. These may then be used to offer users choice in a more controlled manner (more common for mid-sized installations) or allocated to specific job roles and issued very prescriptively (the approach favoured for larger scale deployments).

We'll issue a report with some of the specific numbers included at some point soon, but in the meantime we want to turn our attention to the less glamorous end of mobility – using mobile technology to introduce efficiencies into more "blue collar" areas such as field service management and logistics.

We know from the survey we conducted earlier in the month that quite a few of you are active in this area, but the big question we have is whether you should think of this as separate to dealing with the needs of the professional white collar contingent.

Should you, for example, be looking to put separate solutions or infrastructure in place for mobile email on the one hand and access to your SAP system or similar on the other, or is it sensible to look for a platform and management framework that can deal with both?

At a higher level, we could even ask whether any of the mobile stuff should be separate to your existing middleware, security, and management framework anyway, and if not, in which areas is it particularly important to be properly integrated or coordinated.

So, if you have grappled with these or related questions before, we'd be really interested in hearing about your thoughts and experience, and particularly any advice you have for others trying to make decisions in this area. You can give us your feedback as a comment below. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
Radio hams can encrypt, in emergencies, says Ofcom
Consultation promises new spectrum and hints at relaxed licence conditions
'Serious flaws in the Vertigan report' says broadband boffin
Report 'fails reality test' , is 'simply wrong' and offers ''convenient' justification for FTTN says Rod Tucker
This flashlight app requires: Your contacts list, identity, access to your camera...
Who us, dodgy? Vast majority of mobile apps fail privacy test
Apple Watch will CONQUER smartwatch world – analysts
After Applelocalypse, other wristputers will get stuck in
Shades of Mannesmann: Vodafone should buy T-Mobile US
Biting the bullet would let Blighty-based biz flip the bird at AT&T
Drag queens: Oh, don't be so bitchy, Facebook! Let us use our stage names
Handbags at dawn over free content ad network's ID policy
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.