Lawmakers worry over government network breaches
Congress interests itself in cyber security
Long an afterthought for U.S. lawmakers, cybersecurity has received renewed attention in some parts of Congress.
Last Wednesday, a U.S. House of Representatives' subcommittee took the chief information officer of the Department of Homeland Security, Scott Charbo, to task for allowing 844 significant cybersecurity incidents in the past two years. The breaches included workstations infected with Trojan horses and unauthorized users attaching their personal computers to the Department's network.
The chairman of the Committee on Homeland Security, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., pulled no punches in dressing down Charbo.
"I am not convinced he is serious about fixing the vulnerabilities in our systems, and if he is not committed to securing our networks, I have to question his ability to lead the department's IT efforts," Rep. Thompson said in opening remarks on Wednesday. "I think the first thing that Mr. Charbo needs to explain is why he should be able to keep his job."
The drama replays a number of themes from a hearing two months ago. In April, the same subcommittee - the House Subcommittee on Emerging Threats, Cybersecurity, and Science and Technology - heard testimony from representatives of the Departments of State and Commerce regarding attacks on those agencies' systems the previous year. The Department of State acknowledged in June 2006 that attackers had installed remote access software on systems in the agency and abroad, stolen passwords and targeted information on China and North Korea. In October 2006, the Department of Commerce took hundreds of computers offline following a series of attacks aimed at federal employees' computer accounts by online thieves that appear to be based in China.
"It has become clear that the infiltration of federal government networks and the possible theft of exploitation of our information is one of the most critical issues confronting our nation," Rep. James Langevin, D-RI, chairman of the House Subcommittee on Emerging Threats, Cybersecurity, and Science and Technology, said in a written opening statement on Wednesday.
For security experts, the hearings underscore that some parts of the U.S. government - which has given cybersecurity short shrift since the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 - are ready to take the security of federal networks more seriously.
"Congress seems to have come alive, and all of us like it," said Marcus Sachs, deputy director of the computer science lab at government contractor SRI International and an incident handler for the SANS Institute. "By holding public hearings, it brings a new light to the facts that might otherwise be buried in reports."
Over the past four years, the federal government has only showed slight improvement in complying with the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA), a law designed to force federal agencies to be aware of the information assets and systems connected to their networks.
In 2003, the first year that the agencies submitted audits of their networks, the 24 federal organizations had an overall grade of 'D' with eight departments receiving a failing grade. By 2006, the government's overall grade rose to a 'C-'. However, eight agencies still received failing grades and the Department of Veterans Affairs - the focus of a massive potential breach of information that could have affected the nation's 26.5 million veterans - did not even submit its audit report.
DHS have not a clue
In 2002 the head of DHS cybersecurity made a presentation at the Black Hat Briefings and Seminars. He had some interesting things to say, but didn't really say anything that inspired confidence.
DHS had six people at DEFCON that weekend. They were the people wearing the suits. The Feebs were wearing kahkis. The CIA had shorts and sandals, but were wearing black t-shirts with the CIA seal on them. Only one NSA got pegged.
DHS has some good people working for them. I know a few. The problem is, there are only a few. They are so concentrated on massive attacks on the infrastructure and can't view the small attacks as an issue. If someone gets in and steals our intelligence reports on China, ho hum. Just as long as they didn't turn off the power to NYC.
This makes me soo much better...
...about the deal that the EU has struck with the US:
So, that's FIFTEEN years that my personal data will be stored on these trojan-ridden computers. Oh, goody!
There's an obvious answer of course
Make it illegal to know about any security breaches in government systems. Job done.