This article is more than 1 year old

PowerColor ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT graphics card

AMD's HD 2600 XT and HD 2400 XT debut

One notable area of difference between the HD 2600 XT and 8600 GT is heat production. The PowerColor uses a simple heatsink that leaves the memory uncovered with a 65mm fan that turns relatively slowly and which makes very little noise. We've seen a similar cooler on an Asus GeForce 8600 GTS that worked very well. However, the Nvidia chip is quite toasty while the heatsink on the HD 2600 XT remained cool to the touch. Bet your bottom dollar there will be passively cooled variants of this chip that shed a minimal amount of heat inside your PC case. This also bodes very well for the mobile version where low power usage is so important.

Incidentally, PowerColor will be bringing out a GDDR 4 version of the HD 2600 XT that runs the memory at 2200MHz, which is significantly faster than the GDDR3 in front of us here. However, the core will still run at 800MHz so we doubt that this revision will close the gap on the GeForce 8600 GTS.

3DMark06 test
3DMark06 test - longer bars are better
Longer bars are better

The HD 2600 XT is something of a disappointment when it comes to performance, but we haven't looked at the price, and, my oh my, it's a huge step down from the cheapest HD 2900 XT: £74 to the HD 2900 XT's £199. AMD estimates the other members of the family will be priced thus:

  • HD 2600 Pro - £55-60
  • HD 2400 XT...£45-50
  • HD 2400 Pro...£30-35

We have it on good authority that graphics card manufacturers are having a tough time weaning the punters off lowly hardware such as the Radeon X300 SE, which is a truly horrible piece of hardware but it's very cheap to buy: just £25.

Elder Scrolls: Oblivion test
Elder Scrolls Oblivion test - longer bars are better
Longer bars are better

Let's hope the HD 2400 Pro takes over from the X300 and X1300, and soon. Getting back to the HD 2600 XT, we can't see it makes significant odds whether you go for the new AMD chip or a GeForce 8600 GT. Both the performance and the list of features are near-identical so very likely it comes down to your personal choice of ATI drivers over Nvidia. Or vice versa.

Verdict

The fastest AMD ATI Radeon HD 2600 delivers the same performance as the slowest Nvidia GeForce 8600. However, AMD has redressed the balance with some clever pricing. Our grim experiences with Half Life 2 make it clear that AMD has to do some work on its drivers, but we were pleasantly surprised by the combination of gaming performance and lower heat production.

70%

PowerColor ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT graphics card

The PowerColor HD 2600 XT is a decent budget DirectX 10 card that takes on the GeForce 8600 GT head-to-head
Price: £74 RRP

More about

More about

More about

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like