News ToolsReg Shops |
Comments on ‘Ofcom hands Channel 5 biggest-ever fine’Two Five shows discontinuedPublished Wednesday 27th June 2007 10:13 GMT
I can't believe itBy Adrian Jones
Posted Wednesday 27th June 2007 10:35 GMT
The questions that "Brainteaser" asked were so ridiculously easy, It's incredible that they couldn't find a correct answer. This is Five's responsibility, but shouldn't Endemol pay too?By Anonymous Coward
Posted Wednesday 27th June 2007 11:19 GMT
I hope the legal departments at the various TV channels have considered this kind of possibility when drawing up contracts for programme purchase. It would seem somewhat unfair for Five not to be able to pass on some of the fine/costs. But if they can't, fair enough, it might encourage Five (and others) to monitor their suppliers' practices more closely in future. Is there any Endemol-originated content that isn't in some way utter rubbish or utterly corrupt or both? Cheetahs!By Sam
Posted Wednesday 27th June 2007 12:22 GMT
With a name like that; you can colour me unsuprised. why no fraud charges ?By Anonymous Coward
Posted Wednesday 27th June 2007 13:36 GMT
Why are they letting these people off with a fine ?. They should bring criminal charges for the fraud that it is, or obtaining money by deception or similar. This is going on and on and on....... and no one is really doing much about it. The period for commenting on this story has finished |
|
Top 20 stories • All The Week’s Headlines • Archive • Search