Security:
News ToolsReg Shops |
Comments on ‘Anti-spam sites weather DDoS assault’Storm Trojan fingered in tempestPublished Monday 11th June 2007 14:37 GMT
Rule #3 demonstrated againBy Anonymous Coward
Posted Monday 11th June 2007 15:36 GMT
Spammers are always desperate; that's because they are essentially stupid. Dave Lindhardt, the spammer of e360insight in Illinois, has again demonstrated his desperation by launching a frivolous lawsuit against a number of anti-spammers for "defamation" - they allegedly called him a spammer, and he claims that hurt his "business." Of course, the entire purpose of the lawsuit is to prove a falsehood - that Spamhaus does business in Illinois. Most of the people he's suing have more connection with the Manahattan Project than they do with Spamhaus. Nothing newBy weffew
Posted Monday 11th June 2007 15:42 GMT
DDOS on spamhaus et al is normal for spammers. Indeed you are'nt a major spammer until you've DDOS'd them. Why DDOS them? so you can get your fresh spam out while stopping companies from updating their rulesets and blocklists. It's not supposed to be a prolonged attack. Nastiest attackBy prathlev
Posted Monday 11th June 2007 15:54 GMT
Second paragraph: "...was rendered temporarily available...". Now THAT's an attack only the very well prepared can sustain. Heck, if all our systems suddenly worked we'd have to stop "working on a solution" (a.k.a. drinking loads of coffee and surfing The Register). I no time, some suit would suggest that we could spend our working hours actually DOING something. Terrible thought... ;-P /Prathlev The period for commenting on this story has finished |
|
Top 20 stories • All The Week’s Headlines • Archive • Search