Feeds

LiveJournal says sorry for blanket sex-talk censorship

'Well, we really screwed this one up...'

The essential guide to IT transformation

LiveJournal has apologised after taking down 500 discussion groups it felt were too sexed up. The purge was intended to wipe out discussion of paedophilia, rape, and sexual violence, the firm says.

Ironically, journals run by people who work to support victims of sexual abuse also got caught in the cleansing. Barak Berkowitz, chairman and chief executive of Six Apart, the company that owns LiveJournal, explained that this is because interests listed in profiles are automatically interpreted as "I'm in favour of x" or "I support x".

Journals containing literary criticism, fan fiction, and role-playing characters were also caught up in the clear-out.

The move triggered a huge backlash from users, with complaints flooding in to parent company Six Apart. Berkowitz moved quickly to issue a statement saying: "Well, we really screwed this one up..."

"For reasons we are still trying to figure out what was supposed to be a well planned attempt to clean up a few journals that were violating LiveJournal's policies that protect minors turned into a total mess. I can only say I'm sorry, explain what we did wrong and what we are doing to correct these problems and explain what we were trying to do but messed up so completely."

The company now says it has reinstated all fandom journals, all fiction journals, and all the journals that only had a problem flagged in their profile.

"A large number of journals that are clear violations of our policies will remain suspended," Berkowitz said.

Some users commenting on Berkowitz's post have appreciated the swift and open response, but others still feel betrayed by the host's actions.

Altoidsaddict writes:

"I'm more resentful that this happened:

a) lumping rape survivors in with perpetrators and b) at the behest of one of the worst "save the children" groups out there, and not when Perverted Justice offered to help a long time ago, and c) because it affected the bottom line, not because it was the right thing to do.

The suspensions can be fixed, but these intangibles can't with a mere flip of a switch.

Meanwhile, Spell writes:

There has been NO irreparable damage done here, people are blowing it WAY out of proportion and creating way more drama than there needs to be. And now it's those people who are looking like the assholes here, because at least LJ has the good grace to admit their mistake and try to clear it up.

Part of the reason for the sheer ferocity of the backlash must lie in the source of the complaint that prompted the suspension of so many journals.

One of the groups that complained to LiveJournal is a group called Warriors for Innocence. A representative of that group, referred to only as "Sues", told CNet's news service that the complaint did not "knowingly" include fandom or role playing journals. She also says on her own blog that she did not intend that survivor and support groups be deleted: "[LiveJournal's] decided who to delete," she concludes.

Berkowitz says that although the complaint may have come from WfI, it was LiveJournal's own standards used to determine which sites would be suspended: "The source of this complaint was not the source of the problem we created."

As of Thursday, journals had started to reappear. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
'Stop dissing Google or quit': OK, I quit, says Code Club co-founder
And now a message from our sponsors: 'STFU or else'
Ex US cybersecurity czar guilty in child sex abuse website case
Health and Human Services IT security chief headed online to share vile images
Don't even THINK about copyright violation, says Indian state
Pre-emptive arrest for pirates in Karnataka
The police are WRONG: Watching YouTube videos is NOT illegal
And our man Corfield is pretty bloody cross about it
Felony charges? Harsh! Alleged Anon hackers plead guilty to misdemeanours
US judge questions harsh sentence sought by prosecutors
Oz biz regulator discovers shared servers in EPIC FACEPALM
'Not aware' that one IP can hold more than one Website
Apple tried to get a ban on Galaxy, judge said: NO, NO, NO
Judge Koh refuses Samsung ban for the third time
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.