Hardware:
News ToolsReg Shops |
Comments on ‘Dell goes direct into Wal-Mart's clutches’Low prices meet always low pricesPublished Thursday 24th May 2007 18:26 GMT
From what I've heard...By Ed
Posted Thursday 24th May 2007 20:02 GMT
that $50 is roughly what it costs Dell for a Windows license. I think thats about what people get back if they make a fuss and ask for a refund for the license. Randy must be pouting...By Brett Brennan
Posted Thursday 24th May 2007 20:11 GMT
...or he's smirking behind Mark's back. This is, of course, referring to Mr. Mott's former life as both VP/CIO of Wal*Mart and Dell. Of course, Dell is now "playing with the big boys" in retail. Wal*Mart is the TOUGHEST company to work with as a supplier: their low price promise is strictly enforced by POUNDING their suppliers to cut everything to the bone. And Dell will need to match up with Wal*Mart's supply chain - arguably the finest in ANY industry. On the other hand, as an anonymous vendor rep once told me as I gave him a ride from Fayetteville to Bentonville one dark and stormy night: "Wal*Mart forces us to nearly lose money on everything we sell to them - but the VOLUME we do with them is so huge it is worth the loss of margin to maintain the relationship." Selling through the world's largest retailer does have some compensation: as Sam Walton once said "Sell 'em cheap and blow 'em out the doors!" HmmmBy Dillon Pyron
Posted Thursday 24th May 2007 20:17 GMT
Either Dell is making some major profit on the Ubuntu boxes or they aren't paying much for Windows, vs. what you and I have to pay at our local dealer. UKBy Andrew
Posted Thursday 24th May 2007 20:22 GMT
Any ideas when they'll be releasing the Ubuntu Desktops for UK / European customers? The OEM Windows license costBy Morely Dotes
Posted Thursday 24th May 2007 20:57 GMT
OEM Windows was US$30 for Windows 2000 when I was building PCs as an OEM, and I rather doubt that's changed for XP. The wide variety of Vista options probably means the price point varies between $30 and $50 (but anyone buying Vista deserves to be gouged considerably more than that anyway). Considering...By J
Posted Thursday 24th May 2007 21:50 GMT
...that the monitor is almost one third of the price of the $599... $409 is not bad for the machine. Just hope it does not fall apart or anything. The 2-3 year old Optiplex GX280 ones we have here in the lab are great. At least mine, running SuSE 9.2, because my friend with Win XP is suffering badly with lack of memory and general slowness (computers bought at the same time, both with XP, mine immediately reformatted...:-). ASDABy bruce
Posted Friday 25th May 2007 07:43 GMT
Does this mean in the UK dell will eventually sell through Asda? Ubuntu means lower support cost than VistaBy Richard Kay
Posted Friday 25th May 2007 08:30 GMT
Dell seem to be taking into consideration the fact that Ubuntu already just works on their systems and can be installed with less skill in less time than Vista. That was my experience anyway. So maybe the better Ubuntu system price allows something for more reliable software meaning Dell have to provide less support time. The period for commenting on this story has finished |
|
Top 20 stories • All The Week’s Headlines • Archive • Search