The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

MP questions police computer policy

Records not being removed from system

Ensure Ease of Recovery with Asigra’s Agentless Software

An MP has said police forces need to be more consistent in handling requests for removal of records from the Police National Computer (PNC).

Stephen Crabb, Conservative member for Pembrokeshire, said figures provided by the Home Office suggest that not enough cases are being removed from the system, even when the people affected have proved they are innocent of any crime.

In answer to a parliamentary question, he was told by Home Office minister Tom McNulty that since March of last year 80 cases have been removed from the PNC with another 69 in the process of removal. This covers the period since the publication of the Association of Chief Police Officers' Retention Guidelines for Nominal Records on the Police National Computer (pdf).

"I think there should be more," Crabb told GC News. "The purpose of the guidelines was that there should be conformity across the board, but it appears that in different parts of the country, with different chief constables, there are different results.

"Different practices are going on and the Home Office should be pushed on it."

He said his concerns were initially prompted by the case of constituent who had been wrongfully arrested and received an apology from the local chief constable, but whose details have remained on the PNC.

This article was originally published at Kablenet.

Kablenet's GC weekly is a free email newsletter covering the latest news and analysis of public sector technology. To register click here.

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

Latest Comments

DNA Records?

> his concerns were initially prompted by the case of constituent who had been wrongfully arrested and received an apology from the local chief constable, but whose details have remained on the PNC.

And, presumably, since he was arrested, his DNA has also been taken and recorded and we all know that the Police are *so* willing to take DNA details off their databases...

0
0

Sigh....

" even when the people affected have proved they are innocent of any crime. "

Remember the old days, when it was up to the police to prove you guilty of a crime, not up to you to prove yourself innocent? I miss them.

0
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
Number of cops abusing Police National Computer access on the rise
Only a telegram from the Queen can get you off it
 breaking news
NSA whistleblower to tech firms, Obama: 'Grow a pair!'
Ed Snowden: Email tracking grabs 'IPs, raw data, content, headers, attachments, everything'
SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
Google flings another £1m at online child sex abuse vid CRACKDOWN
See, see, we're trying, ad giant tells Daily Mail UK.gov
 breaking news
NSA PRISM-gate: Relax, GCHQ spooks 'keep us safe', says Cameron
Whatever they are up to, it's all above board, we're told
PRISM snitch claims NSA hacked Chinese targets since 2009
Snowden suddenly looks safer in Hong Kong after revelations
 breaking news
US chief spook: Look, we only want to spy on 6.66 BEELLLION of you
Americans assured they are not in the NSA's sights
NSA: We COULD track you by your phone ... if we WANTED to
Honestly, too much work, can't be bothered