The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Apple invents novel back-to-front iPod control

Touchpad on the back of the device

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

Apple has asked the US Patent and Trademark Office to credit it with inventing the concept of a rather clever reverse-action user interface: the display on the front is controlled by a touchpad on the back.

Apple iPod control patent - device structure

It's a smart idea derived, we'd imagine, from observing how people hold phones, iPods, PDAs and the like. All these devices are held in one hand, thumb on one side, most of the fingers on the other and the the index finger in particular on the back.

What, Apple engineers appear to have imagined, if that solitary finger could steer a cursor around the screen?

For that you need a touchpad set to operate in reverse: as the finger moves to the left of the panel, the cursor on the screen on the other side of the device movies to the right, and that's pretty much what Apple's patent filing - revealed by AppleInsider - describes. It argues that this is a much better way of controlling gadgets with small screens, as the touchpad can be much larger than the display for greater sensetivity.

Apple iPod control patent - UIs

And we'd add that it's easier to steer a cursor with your index finger than reach across the main display with your thumb. And it certainly beats pulling out a stylus and using the device two-handed.

Couple the concept with past Apple filings that describe virtual controls displayed on a handheld's screen, and you have a novel take on future iPods - video-centric or otherwise - and iPhones.

Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything

Latest Comments
Anonymous Coward

Apple lacking in ergonomic research???

While a clever use of space this seems to neglect the simple fact that of all our digits the thumb has the most flexibility and range of motion. I for one would be frustrated to no end by a control area on the back of a phone/PDA. Especially modern devices with large surface areas to accommodate fancy displays. I compared the range of motion myself, and found that I could only reach areas outside of a square the size of the first 2 joints of my index finger with a great deal of awkwardness, where my thumb could cover the entire surface of whatever fit in my palm with ease.

0
0

Won't smudge the front screen.

This method won't smudge the front screen with finger prints.

Which has been a common complaint with touch screen interfaces.

0
0
Anonymous Coward

Re: I seem to recall...

Apple utilizing a product someone else came up with years before and then chalking it up to "Apple engineering innovation"? Blasphemy!

0
0

More from The Register

Samsung Galaxy Note 8: Proof the pen is mightier?
Sammy’s iPad Mini killer has a stylus to stab other rivals too
Microsoft lures buy-curious vixens, corduroys with a cheap fondle
Surface slab sales latest: Will no one rid Ballmer of these turbulent tabs?
First look: iOS 7 for iPad
No, Apple hasn't released it yet, but that doesn't stop intrepid devs
 breaking news
Curtain drops on Apple Store ahead of WWDC: What lies behind?
Steve Jobs watching from on high. No pressure, lads
 breaking news
Cold, dead hands of Steve Jobs slip from iPhones: The Cult of Ive is upon us
Billionaire biz baron's death clears way for uber-shiny iOS 7
Airbus imagines suitcases that find themselves
Point your mobe at your smalls to track their every move
Surprise! Intel smartphone trounces ARM in power trials
Tests show equal performance while sipping significantly less juice
Samsung plans LTE Advanced version of Galaxy S4
1Gbps download capability could stiffen drooping S4 sales forecasts
Apple said to be 'exploring' 5.7-inch iPhone
Who's the copycat this time, Mr. Cook?