Feeds

DRM pinches Motorola's stream

And Apple dries it up

Security for virtualized datacentres

Software 2007 Motorola is champing at the bit to run with mobile media, but the stables must be shoveled out first.

"The technology is there," Motorola CEO Ed Zander said today, "but what has to get figured out first is DRM, security and monetization."

In his keynote speech at the Software 2007 conference in Santa Clara, Zander spoke of the company's plans for the future and the stumbling blocks along the way.

He sees this decade as technology's "age of mobility." Motorola dreams of a not-too-distant-future where mobile devices will be able to transfer video seamlessly regardless of brand or even program a DVR.

This is technically possible now, but content owners aren't ready to release their deathgrip on proprietary media. Zander isn't holding his breath for any changes: "It's going to take a while," he said.

In the meantime, Motorola has its eyes on the business sector. The company has recently been making buys to gain face in the enterprise sector.

Zander said Motorola has borged 13 companies for about $6bn in the past two years and there's more to come. "Expect to see more acquisitions and more integration."

Mobile devices for the business sector accounts for about 35 per cent of Motorola's business, but the percentage is growing, Zander said. The company thinks "the next big thing" will see personal mobile devices become enterprise devices as well. Everything that employees would traditionally do on a laptop will be done on a phone.

The plan works for Zander, anyway. Pulling out his own phone, he announced that corporate information as well as personal information is stored in the device. If he lost his phone at the conference, Zander announced proudly, he would be screwed.

Perhaps further reflecting on this statement, he later mentioned that his phone has several unnamed "security features" to protect it.

Zander did some wiggling when show host M.R. Rangaswami brought up the iWord. His reaction went from aggressive to limp.

"How does Motorola deal with the iPhone?"

"Well, how do they deal with us?"

Zander's bravado began to fade. "Don't quote me."

And then...

"I'm not going to pick winners and losers." ®

Protecting against web application threats using SSL

More from The Register

next story
Brit telcos warn Scots that voting Yes could lead to HEFTY bills
BT and Co: Independence vote likely to mean 'increased costs'
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
New 'Cosmos' browser surfs the net by TXT alone
No data plan? No WiFi? No worries ... except sluggish download speed
Radio hams can encrypt, in emergencies, says Ofcom
Consultation promises new spectrum and hints at relaxed licence conditions
Turnbull: NBN won't turn your town into Silicon Valley
'People have been brainwashed to believe that their world will be changed forever if they get FTTP'
Blockbuster book lays out the first 20 years of the Smartphone Wars
Symbian's David Wood bares all. Not for the faint hearted
Bonking with Apple has POUNDED mobe operators' wallets
... into submission. Weve squeals, ditches payment plans
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL
Discussing the vulnerabilities inherent in Wi-Fi networks, and how using TLS/SSL for your entire site will assure security.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.