Judge in MP3 case to Microsoft: time to pay up
$1.5bn, please
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Microsoft has been ordered to stump up $1.5bn for violating MP3 patents owned by Alcatel and Lucent Technologies.
US federal judge Rudi Brewster told the software giant that it's time to pay damages, after a trial jury found Microsoft guilty in February.
The judge ordered the $1.5bn to be split between Lucent and Alcatel - the latter inherited the case along with its 2005 purchase of Lucent. According to Brewster the court finds "no just reason for the delay and therefore enters final judgment on these patents".
Microsoft stepped into the case, originally brought by Lucent against Gateway and Dell, in case it was obliged to re-reimburse the OEMs should they lose.
Microsoft is still in the appeals phase of the case, with a hearing expected in June, so is not likely to panicked by this latest chapter in its legal woes.
The order came as - on the other side of the country - the US Supreme Court ruled 7-1 in Microsoft's favor that it did not infringe AT&T's IP in encoding and compression of speech in Windows. ®
COMMENTS
DRM
You can argue this is why many music sites use DRM laden formats and not MP3. The MP3 licence holders are greedy and will sue anyone providing MP3 downloads.
Microsoft should sue...
Microsoft should sue whoever they paid money to to licence the MP3 technology in the first place. Presumably whoever they licenced it from was not the owner which seems to be where the confusion has arisen.
Microsoft anti patent?
Martin,
unfortunately I don't think they would be marching with you . . http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2006/mar06/03-065000PatentPR.mspx
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
