Feeds

Survey: Storage users seek interoperability

Want products more interoperablebleblerer

Boost IT visibility and business value

The Storage Networking Industry Association (SNIA) End User Council (EUC) announced today the results of its third end user survey (ATtRoiTEUS).

The survey, titled Storage Interoperability: So What's the Problem? examines issues facing storage and networking customers regarding multi-vendor systems.

The Problem which SNIA refers to in the title clearly does not lie with interoperability. Interoperability is the bee's knees, the elephant's instep, the cat's whiskers, according to survey participants (and translated through a 1920s American.)

Sixty two per cent of those surveyed would pay more for a tested and supported multi-vendor storage solution than single vendor proprietary products. On average, they would pay about 7 per cent more. Twenty three per cent would not choose a product that did not offer interoperability. Five per cent didn't value interoperability and 10 per cent weren't sure (inter-roper-who-er-whatsit?).

The survey found that end users lose more sleep over upgrades than they do about integrating new hardware and worrying about their old outdated management software. Participants said 50 per cent of vendor-recommended upgrades actually fix a problem and 25 per cent of the time the upgrade makes the problem worse.

The largest concerns for end users were: Interoperability and Integration, heavy reliance on vendor roadmaps, support between OS and hardware vendors, significant verification and testing required and vendor/product consolidation.

Numbers were reached polling 387 people, consisting of EUC members, StorageNetworking.org users and Storage Networking World attendees. Most were from large businesses with over 10,000 employees.

You can take a look at the full 47-page report in PFD format here. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
The Return of BSOD: Does ANYONE trust Microsoft patches?
Sysadmins, you're either fighting fires or seen as incompetents now
Microsoft: Azure isn't ready for biz-critical apps … yet
Microsoft will move its own IT to the cloud to avoid $200m server bill
Oracle reveals 32-core, 10 BEEELLION-transistor SPARC M7
New chip scales to 1024 cores, 8192 threads 64 TB RAM, at speeds over 3.6GHz
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
Flash could be CHEAPER than SAS DISK? Come off it, NetApp
Stats analysis reckons we'll hit that point in just three years
Object storage bods Exablox: RAID is dead, baby. RAID is dead
Bring your own disks to its object appliances
Nimble's latest mutants GORGE themselves on unlucky forerunners
Crossing Sandy Bridges without stopping for breath
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.