The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Flipping to the test results we didn't run Far Cry in Vista as the testing utility that we use to run a time demo doesn't work under Vista. The game itself played just fine and by the time we got to that stage in the proceedings it was clear that the performance of the two graphics cards was fundamentally identical. Performance in Vista was a fraction slower than XP in 3DMark06 while FEAR XP and Half Life Lost Coast were both faster.

Far Cry Benchmark Results
Far Cry Benchmark Results


Bigger bars are better

F.E.A.R. Benchmark Results
F.E.A.R. Benchmark Results


Bigger bars are better

Half-Life 2 Benchmark Results
Half-Life 2 Benchmark Results


Bigger bars are better

We've skirted around one enormous area of difference which is DirectX 10. The 8600GT supports DirectX 10 while the 7950GT is DirectX 9.0c and Shader Model 3 compliant. That should give the nod to the 8600GTS but we haven't yet seen a single piece of DirectX 10 software, unless you count Windows Vista, so we're not going to fall into that particular trap. Instead, let's just say that the 8600GT ought to be reasonably future-proof.

Verdict

For the time being we have little choice but to ignore DirectX 10 and that means there is currently no compelling reason to upgrade from a GeForce 6600 or 7600 to an 8600. If we found ourselves forced to buy a graphics card in the next few weeks it would be a bit daft to miss out on the opportunity of playing Halo 2, so what would we do? Hmm, it's a tricky one, but there would be a strong temptation to plump for a GeForce 8800GT with 320MB of memory at £215.

70%
MSI NX8600GTS-T2D256E-HD-OC graphics card

MSI NX8600GTS graphics card

Performance is essentially identical to a 512MB DDR3 GeForce 7950GT, but there’s uncertainty over the DirectX 10 features
Price: £153 inc VAT RRP More Info: MSI Computer website
Latest Comments
(Written by Reg staff)

Corrected typo

Sorry about that. It was indeed a typographical error. All sorted now though.

0
0

Yup, it's a typo alright

Sorry about that chaps. The review was written in a tearing hurry over the weekend but even so it was a daft mistake.

Hopefully Scott will correct is ASAP

Leo Waldock

0
0

I'll attempt.

I'll attempt to bring to your attention, in a cohesive manner, what I believe the two previous posters are attempting to say. It appears that you have made a mistake in your images, and called the NX8600 and 'NX6800'. If this is not a typo, I would enjoy if you would tell me where I can find this positively beastial 6800-based GPU.

0
0

Nice to see

that a 6800GTS graphics card does so well in the benckmarks.

les...

0
0

typo?

take a look at the benchmark tables again, they say 6800gts not 8600gts, just thort i would bring it to your attention

0
0

More from The Register

Microsoft reveals Xbox One, the console that can read your heartbeat
Upgrades Live service – and no always-on requirement
MYSTERY Nokia Lumia with gazillion-pixel camera 'spotted'
With 20Mp sensor - NOW will you try Windows Phone 8?
 breaking news
The iWatch is coming! The iWatch is coming!
Reports: Apple's wrister to have 1.5-inch OLED, test units being built
Review: Sony Xperia SP
The new mid-range marvel? Oh yes.
US boffin builds 32-way Raspberry Pi cluster
Beowulf cluster built for the price of a single PC
Dell's PC-on-a-stick landing in July: report
Wyse up, suckers, could this be a new set-side-stick?
Review: HP Pavilion 14 Chromebook
All roads lead to Chrome?
Borked your iDevice? Pay EVEN MORE to have it fixed by Applecare
Or scream at their hapless techies on their forums
Euro PC shipments plummet into bottomless pit of DOOOOM
11th quarter of decline, 20pc drop on last year - Gartner