The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Comments on: Google buys DoubleClick for $3.1bn cash

I'm all for the amalgamation of online advertising companies. 

Posted Saturday 14th April 2007 09:37 GMT

It makes it easier to block adverts!

I do hope this means... 

Posted Saturday 14th April 2007 10:28 GMT

that DoubleClick will start sucking less from a user perspective. They've been prone to some very annoying adverts in days of yore...

Now is the time to start distrusting 

Posted Monday 16th April 2007 07:08 GMT

I cannot stand DoubleClick, and for its goals and its methods I care little. Now that Google has bought the demon spawn, I will be more suspicious about what Google is actually storing on my hard disk.

Pascal.

It was always about ads 

Posted Tuesday 17th April 2007 07:56 GMT

It might have started as a search engine, but google was always an advertising company. It just mastered the online advertising using its dominant position as a gatekeeper of the Internet through the most efficient search engine yet. Its dominance starts to resemble very much the one Microsoft imposed on us the past 2 decades.

The buyout of the dreaded DoubleClick (which I personally hunt down like pest on my PCs) proves that Business and Ethics are very hard to pair.

If the “google is good" myth crumbles, (and such moves certainly help in that direction), there could be a massive reaction. Nobody wants to have all their mail, chats, calls, documents, calendars, contacts, notes, files, videos etc, stored in the hands of an ambiguous and eventually unscrupulous advertiser. NOBODY

Even if the service is good and free!!

I am already planning my retreat...

Finally ... even in the internet age, you really get what you pay for!

Christoforos Korakas

Athens, Greece

Don’t Miss