Science:
News ToolsReg Shops |
Comments on ‘Researchers serve up obesity gene’Not the same as having fat bones, thoughPublished Friday 13th April 2007 14:50 GMT
Just another risk factorBy James
Posted Friday 13th April 2007 15:06 GMT
Sadly the mainstream press seems unable to distinguish between a cause and a risk factor. This is no different from cancer genes like BRCA1, it simply increases risk of cancer not causes it (mutant BRCA1 actually causes cells to fail to repair DNA properly making any damage from external sources much more likely to lead to cancer). As we all know the true cause of obesity is failure to wear your tinfoil hat, the population is so much easier to oppress when it can't muster the energy to get off its collective fat arse and oppose the govt Not a complete surpriseBy Chris Miller
Posted Friday 13th April 2007 15:51 GMT
I expect we all know people who seem to be able to eat large meals and take minimal exercise while remaining as thin as a rake. But the only way to lose weight (whatever your genetic code) is simple - eat less and/or exercise more. As the old saw has it: "nobody came out of Belsen overweight" (though it's certainly possible that the only ones to come out of Belsen were those who were overweight when they went in). But what's the mechanismBy Anonymous Coward
Posted Friday 13th April 2007 20:01 GMT
The press seem to be supposing that somehow having two copies of this gene make you more able to extract energy from food.So everyone else, through human history has been needlessly wasting some fraction of the food they eat for lack of the right gene? Seems more likely that they've found the gene for greediness/laziness/indolence/dislike-of-sport or some such which is sure to correlate pretty well with having a few extra pounds. The period for commenting on this story has finished
|
|
Top 20 stories • All The Week’s Headlines • Archive • Search