Hardware:
News ToolsReg Shops |
Comments on ‘Xyratex to vendors: dense RAID is 4U’Bigger box, packed to the brimPublished Monday 9th April 2007 21:53 GMT
Similar?By David Benoit
Posted Monday 9th April 2007 22:15 GMT
Looks very similar to Sun's X4500. http://www.sun.com/servers/x64/x4500/ A rip-off of the Sun Fire X4500. So what?By Anonymous Coward
Posted Monday 9th April 2007 22:37 GMT
This is just another press-release-disguised-as-an-article. The idea, and the best execution, belongs to Sun. http://www.sun.com/servers/x64/x4500/ Where's your head, El Reg? Not like the X4500 at all...By Anonymous Coward
Posted Tuesday 10th April 2007 07:12 GMT
This product isn't like the x4500 at all. The x4500 is a server, not a storage array. The hard drive layout might be similar. But the x4500 has just a single motherboard, while the Xyratex has dual RAID controllers only. It is pretty sad when Register readers can't tell the difference between a storage array and a server. I guess oranges are poorly executed copies of apples. storage array, storage server, storage marketingBy Anonymous Coward
Posted Tuesday 10th April 2007 18:07 GMT
Not like the X4500 at all? Here's an article hand-waving about the densest storage solution on the market, while the Sun X4500, offering the exact same density for some time now, it pretended not to exist. It's sad when Reg writers (and readers!) can't smell marketing crap a mile away. People buy the X4500 for storage density, not because there's anything mind-blowing about Sun's first-generation Opteron gear. The period for commenting on this story has finished
|
|
Top 20 stories • All The Week’s Headlines • Archive • Search