Feeds

Acer up, Dell down in laptop sales

Acer overtakes Toshiba

Build a business case: developing custom apps

Acer has long let it be known that it is gunning for Lenovo's third place in the global PC market. In Q4 last year, it picked off an easier target, overtaking Toshiba to become the world's third best selling notebook PC maker.

Toshiba's sales fell slightly in the quarter, which would have been nice for Acer, but the rise in the ranks did not depend on the missteps of others, according to iSuppli. The market watcher attributes Acer's Q4 sales success, particularly in Europe, to aggressive pricing.

"Acer came, Acer saw and Acer conquered in the fourth quarter," said Matthew Wilkins, principal analyst, compute platforms for iSuppli. "...The fourth quarter ranking shows the company is putting its money where its mouth is."

"The company has been very public about its intention to capture the No. 3 spot in the mobile-PC market—and Wilkins said Acer’s success was due to aggressive pricing strategies, which resulted in very impressive sales gains, particularly in Europe.

HP and Dell continue to dominate notebook sales, but Dell had a crap Q4, according to iSuppli's latest numbers, with shipments falling 1.5 per cent from Q3 to 3.52 million units. iSuppli's Wilkins attributes the fall to the 'increasingly competitive situation with Hewlett-Packard, and a generally tougher battle with other OEMs".

But of course, Dell was the earliest and most prominent casualty of last year's Sony notebook battery fiasco, which saw the company recall more than four million units for non-flammable battery retro-fits. This cannot have helped.

Lenovo held steady at fifth place in Q4, shipping 1.9 million units, up 9.1 per cent on Q3.

The fourth quarter saw 23.6 million mobile PC shipments, up from 20.4 million in Q3. For the full year, shipments were 79.6 million, advancing 28.4 per cent on 2005's 61.96 million shipments.

iSuppli forecasts mobile-PC shipments of 98.3 million units this year, up 23.5 per cent from 2006.

iSuppli has put the 2006 headline numbers into a handy chart, in this release. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
Reg man looks through a Glass, darkly: Google's toy ploy or killer tech specs?
Tip: Put the shades on and you'll look less of a spanner
So, Apple won't sell cheap kit? Prepare the iOS garden wall WRECKING BALL
It can throw the low cost race if it looks to the cloud
Apple promises to lift Curse of the Drained iPhone 5 Battery
Have you tried turning it off and...? Never mind, here's a replacement
Now that's FIRE WIRE: HP recalls 6 MILLION burn-risk laptop cables
Right in the middle of Burning Mains Man week
One step closer to ROBOT BUTLERS: Dyson flashes vid of VACUUM SUCKER bot
Latest cleaner available for world+dog in September
Apple's iWatch? They cannae do it ... they don't have the POWER
Analyst predicts fanbois will have to wait until next year
HUGE iPAD? Maybe. HUGE ADVERTS? That's for SURE
Noo! Hand not big enough! Don't look at meee!
Samsung Gear S: Quick, LAUNCH IT – before Apple straps on iWatch
Full specs for wrist-mounted device here ... but who'll buy it?
AMD unveils 'single purpose' graphics card for PC gamers and NO ONE else
Chip maker claims the Radeon R9 285 is 'best in its class'
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.