Feeds

Google funds $500k evil-blocking forcefield for CEO

Family hopes it's out of beta

Build a business case: developing custom apps

Even billionaire colored ball advocates heading companies that do no evil have their problems. Google last year coughed up $530,000 just to keep CEO Eric Schmidt safe.

Google disclosed Schmidt's gold-laced security protection plan in a regulatory filing issued Wednesday. In addition, the ad broker noted $22,000 of payments made on Schmidt's behalf to cover family and friends using Google's infamous “party plane.” Schmidt, however, did save Google's investors same cash on the salary front, pulling in just $1.

Is $530,000 out of line for a security detail? Well, not really, according to security specialist Tim Gould at TG Protective Services. (A much better name than Bullet Catchers, who flaunt the motto “After all, idiots gamble on odds. You gamble on stakes.“)

“That amount sounds pretty accurate for executives that have full-time security services,” Gould told us, adding that $1m for a similar set-up would not be uncommon.

Schmidt's package likely includes security protection for corporate functions as well as security at his home and for his family.

Brash go-getters like Oracle Chief Larry Ellison might spend even more on their security services due to complications protecting Ellison while he's sailing or threatening other executives' dogs. In addition, CEOs who have just collected fat bonuses while laying off staff face disgruntled worker syndrome.

"The average working person can't relate to the payouts these guys get, so, when they're cut, they take it personally," Gould said.

Schmidt, of course, bounces along as a happy nerd, offending few. Sure, Bill Gates has enough chedda to hire a mercenary army, but that would seem brash even for a Microsoft executive. (Perhaps Schmidt has a full-time chair protectionist.)

And Google doesn't produce disgruntled workers. The cultists are too well-fed, massaged and rich to feel ill will toward Schmidt. ®

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
Kate Bush: Don't make me HAVE CONTACT with your iPHONE
Can't face sea of wobbling fondle implements. What happened to lighters, eh?
Assange™: Hey world, I'M STILL HERE, ignore that Snowden guy
Press conference: ME ME ME ME ME ME ME (cont'd pg 94)
Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media
Yanked footage featured British-accented attacker and US journo James Foley
Caught red-handed: UK cops, PCSOs, specials behaving badly… on social media
No Mr Fuzz, don't ask a crime victim to be your pal on Facebook
Ballmer leaves Microsoft board to spend more time with his b-balls
From Clippy to Clippers: Hi, I see you're running an NBA team now ...
Online tat bazaar eBay coughs to YET ANOTHER outage
Web-based flea market struck dumb by size and scale of fail
Amazon takes swipe at PayPal, Square with card reader for mobes
Etailer plans to undercut rivals with low transaction fee offer
Call of Duty daddy considers launching own movie studio
Activision Blizzard might like quality control of a CoD film
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.