Feeds

Microsoft shutters video sharing site

Copyright problems? Who'd have thought?

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Microsoft has closed its video sharing website to new users while it wrestles with how to ensure material on the site obeys copyright laws.

Visitors to the site this morning saw the following message:

Dear Soapbox users,

Thanks for helping us test the Soapbox on MSN Video beta – we've really appreciated the feedback we've gotten from our user community about the service. In order to grow and implement some important new features, Soapbox temporarily requires you to login using your Windows Live ID before you can watch or upload videos. If you don't have a Soapbox account, we'll be opening the doors again very soon with some cool new stuff to try. Thanks for your patience as we continue to build the best place to "make your statement" on the web.

The Soapbox on MSN Video Team

Soapbox is Microsoft's belated entry into the copyright-unfriendly world of user-created video. Although wildy popular, most video sharing sites rely on a proportion of copyright material - which means you need some kind of automated take-down system.

A statement by Adam Sohn, director of global sales and marketing at MSN, said: "As a reflection of our commitment to creating experiences that respect copyright, today, we have temporarily closed Soapbox on MSN Video to new users to begin implementing copyright filtering solutions.

"During this period, users who currently have access to Soapbox will be able to continue to use the service to upload and view videos while we deploy and begin testing the filtering solutions. We want to automate finding copyrighted content for content owners as much as possible through good tools as well as run filtering in the background. Following this period, we will open Soapbox back up in public beta to more broadly test the filters.

"We continue to be committed to providing a great experience for people to find and share their personal videos on Soapbox on MSN Video. As a software company, we have a deep belief in the responsible use and aggressive protection of intellectual property and see these as important steps to ensure the viability and success of our user-generated video service over the long term." ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
Spaffing copyrighted stuff over the web? No search ranking for you
Don't bother telling people if you lose their data, say Euro bods
You read that right – with the proviso that it's encrypted
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.