Feeds

Stiffening at last, ICANN threatens Registerfly with legal action

Shakes off bureaucratic self

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

ICANN has finally firmed up in its battle with troublesome domain registrar Registerfly and looks ready to battle the company in court.

In a letter from its powerhouse attorneys at Jones Day, ICANN accuses Registerfly of willfully refusing to comply with an accreditation audit as mandated in its Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA). Registerfly’s failure to fulfill the most fundamental obligations of its RAA appears to have forced ICANN”s hand – the harshly worded letter lambasts Registerfly for its failure to allow ICANN’s auditor to copy Registerfly’s registration data, and gives notice to Registerfly of ICANN’s intention to file suit against it in federal court on Tuesday, March 6.

ICANN’s announcement is its most forceful action yet against the reeling Registerfly. The company has been dogged by customer allegations of mismanagement and fraud for almost two years. ICANN, however, has until now pussy-footed around the issues raised by irate Registerfly customers.

Although the action falls short of the establishment of a formal, transparent dispute mechanism to resolve these sorts of issues before they spiral out of control, as advocated here, ICANN’s legal gambit provides a roadmap of sorts for future policy.

Registerfly is not the only questionable registrar out there, and some preventative medicine is clearly in order.

The RAA provides a registration grace period (RGP) for domains to resolve minor registration mistakes, but the RGP is worthless in the face of more serious allegations. Nonetheless, for a period of almost two years, ICANN insisted that registration complaints of all sorts needed to be resolved at the registrar – domain holder level.

The letter to Registerfly constitutes an admission of the feebleness of that approach, and establishes that when disputes cannot quickly be resolved at the local level, the buck stops at ICANN. The onus is now on ICANN to build good institutions out of Registerfly's chaos. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Big Content outs piracy hotbeds: São Paulo, Beijing ... TORONTO?
MPAA calls Canadians a bunch of bootlegging movie thieves
Google Glassholes are UNDATEABLE – HP exec
You need an emotional connection, says touchy-feely MD... We can do that
YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
Spaffing copyrighted stuff over the web? No search ranking for you
Just don't blame Bono! Apple iTunes music sales PLUMMET
Cupertino revenue hit by cheapo downloads, says report
Hungary's internet tax cannot be allowed to set a precedent, says EC
More protests planned against giga-tariff for Tuesday evening
US court SHUTS DOWN 'scammers posing as Microsoft, Facebook support staff'
Netizens allegedly duped into paying for bogus tech advice
Feds seek potential 'second Snowden' gov doc leaker – report
Hang on, Ed wasn't here when we compiled THIS document
prev story

Whitepapers

Why cloud backup?
Combining the latest advancements in disk-based backup with secure, integrated, cloud technologies offer organizations fast and assured recovery of their critical enterprise data.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The hidden costs of self-signed SSL certificates
Exploring the true TCO for self-signed SSL certificates, including a side-by-side comparison of a self-signed architecture versus working with a third-party SSL vendor.