Feeds

Botnets punt Russian dog-barking translation spam

9 out of 10 messages are junk

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

Trojan programs, particularly those designed to steal online gaming account credentials, have become the mainstay of malware authors.

According to Kaspersky Labs' Malware Evolution: 2006 Trojan code formed 90 per cent of new malicious code samples seen last year, relegating internet worms, once the mainstay of internet threats, to a fringe category. Many examples of Trojan code are designed to turn infected machines into zombie machines under the control of hackers. These networks of compromised machines (botnets) are commonly used to send spam messages. Kaspersky reckons up to 80 per cent of email traffic is junk mail (managed service security firms make a similar estimate that 77.8 per cent of emails sent during February was spam).

Spammers increasingly use graphics in order to evade spam filters or send junk mail messages masquerading as personal correspondence in order to get the recipient to read the whole message before, for example, clicking on a link to a product punted through junk mail messages.

Kaspersky found products punted through junk mail differed according to language with most Russian language spam offering education and training, and goods ranging from busts of the Russian president to a device which will 'translate' a dog’s bark. English language spam, by contrast, tends to focus on advertising for stocks and shares, penis pills and cheap (pirated) software.

The report also notes that spam became increasingly criminalised in 2006, with spammers actively using SMS to spread spam. The company’s analysts believe that technologies currently in use will continue to evolve in 2007, together with further development of graphical spam, and increased criminalization of mass mailings.

Kaspersky researchers predict that virus writers and spammers will work ever more closely together over coming months and that the number of Trojans will continue to increase. Virus writers will be on the lookout for exploitable vulnerabilities in Vista, Microsoft's new OS. Kaspersky adds that Trojans for J2ME, designed to steal funds from mobile user accounts, can be expected to emerge this year. It also reckons spammers will make more active use of text messaging to spread spam. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
SMASH the Bash bug! Apple and Red Hat scramble for patch batches
'Applying multiple security updates is extremely difficult'
Shellshock: 'Larger scale attack' on its way, warn securo-bods
Not just web servers under threat - though TENS of THOUSANDS have been hit
Apple's new iPhone 6 vulnerable to last year's TouchID fingerprint hack
But unsophisticated thieves need not attempt this trick
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Who.is does the Harlem Shake
Blame it on LOLing XSS terroristas
Researchers tell black hats: 'YOU'RE SOOO PREDICTABLE'
Want to register that domain? We're way ahead of you.
Stunned by Shellshock Bash bug? Patch all you can – or be punished
UK data watchdog rolls up its sleeves, polishes truncheon
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.