Feeds

Emergency meeting on phoneline screwups

Richard & Judy and Saturday Kitchen fingered, X Factor owns up

Security for virtualized datacentres

Premium-rate services regulator ICSTIS has asked for an emergency meeting with broadcasters, programme makers, and service providers to discuss the issues arising from the disclosures around premium-rate competitions on Richard & Judy and BBC's Saturday Kitchen.

Richard & Judy were caught asking people to dial in for the chance to enter a competition, the entrants for which had already been selected, while viewers of Saturday Kitchen got the chance to appear in the next week's show - which was filmed later that day rather than the following week.

Meanwhile, ITV discovered it was overcharging voters using their Sky box to vote for X-Factor contestants, while undercharging competition entrants.

ITV noticed its mistake itself as it charged punters 65 pence for voting, and 35 pence to enter the competition instead of 50 pence and £1, respectively.

The amounts lost by individual punters are pretty small, so arranging refunds is difficult and expensive. Each company is making donations to good causes instead, though refunds are available on production of the appropriate bill. ITV will donate £200, 000 to Childline.

But ICSTIS chairman Sir Alistair Graham is more interested in working out how to avoid these things happening again than dealing with them after the fact:

"Responding to problems after the event is not enough. One of our main priorities at ICSTIS is preventing harm. Broadcasters and others should be looking as a matter of urgency at how the recent problems came about and at what needs to be done to prevent them happening again."

He goes on to propose an emergency meeting next week to discuss what can be done, though the options would appear to be limited. These issues, compounded with confusion at the end of the last Big Brother, have dented public trust in TV premium-rate services, so something will need to be seen to be done, and quickly. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
Are you a fat boy? Get to university NOW, you PENNILESS SLACKER
Rotund types paid nearly 20% less than people who didn't eat all the pies
Emma Watson should SHUT UP, all this abuse is HER OWN FAULT
... said an anon coward who we really wish hadn't posted on our website
Japan develops robot CHEERLEADERS which RIDE on BALLS
'Will put smiles on faces worldwide', predicts corporate PR chief
Bruges Booze tubes to pump LOVELY BEER underneath city
Belgian booze pumped from underground
Let it go, Steve: Ballmer bans iPads from his LA Clippers b-ball team
Can you imagine the scene? 'Hey guys, it's your new owner – WTF is that on your desk?'
Amazon: Wish in one hand, Twit in the other – see which one fills first
#AmazonWishList A year's supply of Arran scotch, ta
SLOSH! Cops dethrone suspect - by tipping over portaloo with him inside
Talk about raising a stink and soiling your career
Ingredient found in TASTY BEER is GOOD for your BRAIN
You only have to drink 2k litres a day to see the effect...
Oz carrier Tiger Air takes terror alerts to new heights
Don't doodle, it might cost you your flight
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.