A relatively minor US anti-trust case could put Microsoft back in hot water with the government, four years after settling its long-running national case.

Prosecutors in an Iowa anti-trust suit against Microsoft have been granted special permission by a judge to present evidence to the Department of Justice (DoJ) they claim proves Microsoft breached its 2002 settlement with the DoJ. That case dragged on for more than five years.

Software expert Ronald Alepin, who has been giving evidence on behalf of plaintiffs in Iowa, said the APIs were made available to developers outside Microsoft in a "very low profile" way in "notes form" to "discourage" developers from using the APIs, while also allowing Microsoft to claim the APIs were documented.

One stipulation of the 2002 settlement between Microsoft and the DoJ is for Microsoft to document all APIs and Windows Communications protocols for the benefit of third parties.

It's a condition Microsoft has been consistently poor at meeting. Officials regularly monitoring Microsoft's compliance under the Microsoft Communications Protocol Program (MCPP) repeatedly criticise Microsoft for its slow progress and for failing to make adequate documentation available. They've also forced Microsoft to substantially change the program, relaxing license pricing and wording.

The Iowa case, Comes v Microsoft, claims Microsoft's business practices have unfairly hurt consumers. More from the case can be found here. ®

Related stories

• US states may seek Microsoft anti-trust extension (2 April 2009)
• Europe could give Microsoft verdict soon (6 June 2007)
• Microsoft to fork out $180m to Iowa (19 April 2007)
• MS dirty tricks archive trickles back to life (21 February 2007)
• Microsoft's dirty tricks archive vanishes (20 February 2007)
• Microsoft and Iowa dream up settlement (14 February 2007)
• Microsoft gives the EC interop info (23 November 2006)
• Ballmer: Microsoft helped security partners on Windows Vista (18 October 2006)
• Microsoft agrees to release Vista interop info (16 October 2006)
• Microsoft falls into line with Korean anti-trust order (23 August 2006)
• Microsoft faces another anti-trust suit (22 February 2006)
• Judge waves through MS $1.1bn California settlement (8 July 2004)
• US court waves through Microsoft DoJ settlement (30 June 2004)
• Microsoft to license Windows ‘protocols’ to rivals (22 April 2003)
• Microsoft exposes more Windows code (6 August 2002)
• DoJ brown-noses MS further in revised settlement (7 November 2001)
• Settlement not dead as DoJ mulls MS appeals (4 April 2000)