Feeds

Vodafone weighs up Indian acquisition

To buy or not to buy?

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

The Vodafone board is to consider launching a $13bn bid for Hutchison Essar, India's fourth largest mobile operator, at a meeting next week, the Financial Times reports.

With growth in Europe waning, a greater investment in developing markets makes sense. And India is developing rapidly. October saw 6.7 million new subscibers sign up, bringing the total to 136 million country-wide.

Vodafone already has a 10 per cent stake in Indian operator Bharti Airtel, but would certainly be required to sell that if its purchase went ahead. Foreign ownership rules would also limit Vodafone from owning more than 74 per cent of the company, so it'll need to find a local partner for the remaining share.

Any such bid would almost certainly be contested by Reliance, the second biggest operator, who has said it is monitoring developments while it considers making a formal bid. There may also be other contenders.

Should the Vodafone board decide against making such an offer, it could signal a strategy shift as India is a market no communications company can afford to ignore. ®

Intelligent flash storage arrays

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.