NSFW Who can fail to love the can-do spirit and have-a-go enthusiasm of Wikipedia? When the site found itself in need of copyright-free illustrations, one user simply generated his own.

We were alerted to this cockle-warming tale via a Something Awful forum, where member Stick_Fig, sets the scene like this:

A group of users has decided that because these promotional photos, which were previously allowed, are copyrighted, they need to be replaced with copyright-free images. Like, images taken by nerds for nerds. The argument is that, since the person is alive, by God, a photo can be taken, so we MUST remove the old, perfectly-fine-minus-a-little-copyright photo now.

Readers poured forth with heroic hand-crafted illustrations, such as this one:

Which indeed looks like a "retarded Bruce Willis", as one SA-er puts it.

It was only when it was discovered that the site's entry for "semen" was in need of copyright-free illustration that one member heroically rose to the challenge. Or rather the member's member did.

The illustration remains, here (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semen). [NSFW]

And what a splendid contribution it is.

So no more gags about Wiki-Fiddling, please. This is truly an example of "User Generated Content" at its most spontaneous.

"There's been a surge of recent editorial activity," observes (http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2006/12/03/Wikipedia) one Tim Bray, "with super-energetic (and apparently well-informed) new contributors trimming and tweaking and growing the articles, often several times per day. In general, while I haven't been convinced that 100 per cent of the changes are improvements, the quality of the articles as a whole is definitely trending up."

Quite so, sir.

How can Britannica possibly compete?

The SA thread can still be found here (http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2203918&perpage=40&pagenumber=1). ®

Related stories

Britannica opens kimono, reveals widgets (8 May 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/05/08/britannica_widgets/
Why you should care that Jimmy Wales ignores reality (6 March 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/06/a_model_wikipedian/
Jimbo Wales dumps lover on Wikipedia (3 March 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/03/jimbo_wales_rachel_marsden/
Google kicks Wikipedia in the googlies (14 December 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/14/googlepedia_announced/
Wikipedia black helicopters circle Utah's Traverse Mountain (6 December 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/06/wikipedia_and_overstock/
Secret mailing list rocks Wikipedia (4 December 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/04/wikipedia_secret_mailing/
Need hard facts? Try Conservapedia (20 June 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/06/20/conservapedia/
If surgery was like Wikipedia... (9 March 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/09/wikipedia_letters/
Farewell, Wikipedia? (6 March 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/06/wikipedia_crisis/
Bogus Wikipedia Prof. was blessed then promoted (2 March 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/02/wikipedia_fraud/
Pro golfer sues over Wikipedia postings (23 February 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/02/23/wiki_suit/
Wiki can link to controversial documents, judge rules (16 February 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/02/16/wiki_doco_judgment_reversed/
Wikipedia defends Reality (2 February 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/02/02/colbert_wikipedia_reality/
Blogs, wikis and the 'long tail' (2 February 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/02/02/blogs_wikis/
Wikipedia Chicken attacked (9 November 2006)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/11/09/wikipedia_chicken_controversy/
Avoid Wikipedia, warns Wikipedia chief (15 June 2006)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/15/wikipedia_can_damage_your_grades/
'ARRRRRGH!!!! GRRrrrrrr!!!!! RAAWWRRR!!!!! ... Dummy' (24 March 2006)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/24/fotw_wikipedia_primal_scream/
Nature mag cooked Wikipedia study (23 March 2006)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/23/britannica_wikipedia_nature_study/
'Take out a subscription to The Register. Then cancel it, and sign it Disgusted Wikipedian' (23 December 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12/23/wikipedia_gift_spurned/