Feeds

Court rejects class action status for Wall Street lawsuit

Banks breathe sigh of relief

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Intelligent flash storage arrays

A lawsuit aiming to hold Wall Street banks accountable for alleged manipulation of technology stock prices in the dotcom boom has failed to win class action status. The ruling could save the banks billions of dollars in payouts.

The suits accused Wall Street banks of colluding with investors to buy shares once a company floated on the stock markets, driving up prices in the so-called after market and making money for those favoured investors it had granted pre-flotation stock.

The suit also said that banks artificially inflated the prices of companies floated in initial public offerings (IPOs) and that they created misleading research about the firms to lure investors into buying the stock.

US legal experts predicted that the case would have been unlikely to go to trial, and would most likely have been settled by the banks. Virtually every investment bank is involved in the case and it could have cost them billions of dollars to settle.

A previous ruling from a federal judge had allowed 310 separate cases to be consolidated into six 'focus' cases. These six cases were granted class action status. Class action suits allow a large number of cases involving similar points of law to be tried together and commonly involve massive payouts because of the large numbers of claimants involved.

That was overturned, though, by a panel of three judges in a federal appeals court, which said that the cases should not have been granted class action status.

The case involved 300 investors, 309 issuing companies and 55 underwriting banks, including the biggest names on Wall St such as Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse First Boston, Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch.

"It's not over," Melvyn Weiss, a founder of one of the law firms acting for the claimants, told the New York Times. "We have the right to seek a review by the entire panel of the Second Circuit. I think the decision doesn't reflect a real understanding of how people get defrauded in our society."

Copyright © 2006, OUT-LAW.com

OUT-LAW.COM is part of international law firm Pinsent Masons.

Remote control for virtualized desktops

More from The Register

next story
MI6 oversight report on Lee Rigby murder: US web giants offer 'safe haven for TERRORISM'
PM urged to 'prioritise issue' after Facebook hindsight find
Assange™ slumps back on Ecuador's sofa after detention appeal binned
Swedish court rules there's 'great risk' WikiLeaker will dodge prosecution
NSA mass spying reform KILLED by US Senators
Democrats needed just TWO more votes to keep alive bill reining in some surveillance
'Internet Freedom Panel' to keep web overlord ICANN out of Russian hands – new proposal
Come back with our internet! cries Republican drawing up bill
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Go beyond APM with real-time IT operations analytics
How IT operations teams can harness the wealth of wire data already flowing through their environment for real-time operational intelligence.
The total economic impact of Druva inSync
Examining the ROI enterprises may realize by implementing inSync, as they look to improve backup and recovery of endpoint data in a cost-effective manner.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.