Feeds

Swiss set back luxury Windows smart phone

Nice look, so-so spec

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Swiss phone maker Zenum will bring its Windows Mobile 5.0-based slimline BlackBerry-like handset, the Opus, to market in March 2007, having missed its planned November 2006 release window, the company has announced.

zenum opus 'premium design' windows smart phone

The Opus prototype required "some improvement", the company explained. Still, the spec sounds fine, if unexceptional: tri-band GSM/GPRS, 802.11b/g Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 1.2 with A2DP wireless stereo support, a two megapixel camera and a QWERTY keyboard. The handset has the usual 64MB of RAM and 128MB of Flash ROM, augmented with MiniSD cards. It's powered by a 700MHz Texas Instruments OMAP 750 CPU, though this may change in the final release.

zenum opus 'premium design' windows smart phone

However, Zenum's pitch is not the spec but the looks - it's touting the Opus as a "premium design" phone, intended to appeal to folk who value looks as much as functionality. The metal and black look is reminiscent of some of Nokia's high-end handsets, and the camera sits beneath a sliding panel.

There's no word yet on what the Opus is likely to cost. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.