Feeds

'Successful' Zune launch no threat to iPod?

Plays For Sure players need to watch out

Build a business case: developing custom apps

Interest in Microsoft's Zune media player appears to be diminishing, if Amazon.com's sales charts are anything to go by. This despite grabbing the number two slot in the US retail market immediately after its 14 November launch, according to figures from market watcher NPD.

NPD's numbers - published yesterday, according to EETimes - show Microsoft's player accounted for nine per cent of unit sales and 13 per cent of revenues in the seven days to 17 November. That placed it just ahead of SanDisk but well behind the iPod's figures of 63 per cent and 72.5 per cent, respectively.

NPD categorised the Zune launch "a success", achieving a decent share of the market despite its relatively high price.

Separately, a survey carried out on behalf of the Reuters newsagency revealed that a third of media player buyers considering a Zune purchase were looking to upgrade from a player they already own. That said only seven per cent of those surveyed, when presented with a list of players, said they were keen on a group that included the Zune.

By contrast, 80 per cent said they'd pick an iPod. Of that number, only 18 per cent said they were upgrading.

Zune's relative strength in the upgrade market lends weight to the argument that the device will hit Microsoft's Plays For Sure hardware partners more than it's going to hurt Apple. The iPod maker is clearly appealing to many more new users, so it's business is still coming through growing the market than canibalising it.

Apple's player today dominated Amazon.com's electronics best-sellers list, let alone the more specific MP3 players list, which contained just three non-Apple devices: two SanDisks - at chart positions six and eight - and a Creative, placed tenth.

Zune didn't even make the top 15 - the black version was listed in 17th place. The brown model came in at 37, the white one at 76. Amazon.com's numbers are updated hourly, and positions change frequently. But iPods tend to cluster around the top ten. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
Reg man looks through a Glass, darkly: Google's toy ploy or killer tech specs?
Tip: Put the shades on and you'll look less of a spanner
So, Apple won't sell cheap kit? Prepare the iOS garden wall WRECKING BALL
It can throw the low cost race if it looks to the cloud
Apple promises to lift Curse of the Drained iPhone 5 Battery
Have you tried turning it off and...? Never mind, here's a replacement
Now that's FIRE WIRE: HP recalls 6 MILLION burn-risk laptop cables
Right in the middle of Burning Mains Man week
One step closer to ROBOT BUTLERS: Dyson flashes vid of VACUUM SUCKER bot
Latest cleaner available for world+dog in September
Apple's iWatch? They cannae do it ... they don't have the POWER
Analyst predicts fanbois will have to wait until next year
HUGE iPAD? Maybe. HUGE ADVERTS? That's for SURE
Noo! Hand not big enough! Don't look at meee!
Samsung Gear S: Quick, LAUNCH IT – before Apple straps on iWatch
Full specs for wrist-mounted device here ... but who'll buy it?
AMD unveils 'single purpose' graphics card for PC gamers and NO ONE else
Chip maker claims the Radeon R9 285 is 'best in its class'
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.