Feeds

Hotel Chocolat wipes up mess

Part deux

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

An online choccy emporium has defended its response to a privacy glitch that left customer details unwrapped and exposed to the world.

Hotel Chocolat head of customer experience Lynn Setchell said she was "absolutely appalled" to learn of the potential data protection problem that occured because of a security flaw on the company's website.

She claimed the chocolate seller responded promptly with a fix once it had been alerted to the issue.

But Setchell accepted that Hotel Chocolat had failed to initially spot the problem and that the first it knew about the security flaw was when El Reg reader Angel Johnson contacted its customer services via email.

She also confirmed that it was unable to determine how long the data had been viewable on its website.

According to the latest email from Angel, Hotel Chocolat had been displaying the sensitive information for quite some time.

"I wrote about it on my blog and one of my commenters said that he had pointed it out to them before and it hadn't been fixed, so he only orders by telephone from them now," she said.

The software used by the company was not an in-house product and had been "bought in good faith", said Setchell, with the understanding that the website would be secure at all times.

Hotel Chocolat is now "fully testing the website's security and taking steps to ensure it doesn't happen again".

Setchell also went to great pains to point out that no customers' financial details had been exposed and was frustrated we didn't talk to her. (Actually, we made five phonecalls to Hotel Chocolat HQ)

Explaining her unavailability, Setchell said the team had failed to deal with the seriousness of the issue and that staff training was required.

When requesting Setchell's direct telephone number, she asked us not to publish it on El Reg. Not a problem, as we wouldn't want to come potentially unstuck with the Data Protection Act now would we? ®

Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL

More from The Register

next story
Spies would need SUPER POWERS to tap undersea cables
Why mess with armoured 10kV cables when land-based, and legal, snoop tools are easier?
Early result from Scots indyref vote? NAW, Jimmy - it's a SCAM
Anyone claiming to know before tomorrow is telling porkies
Jihadi terrorists DIDN'T encrypt their comms 'cos of Snowden leaks
Intel bods' analysis concludes 'no significant change' after whistle was blown
TOR users become FBI's No.1 hacking target after legal power grab
Be afeared, me hearties, these scoundrels be spying our signals
Home Depot: 56 million bank cards pwned by malware in our tills
That's about 50 per cent bigger than the Target tills mega-hack
Hackers pop Brazil newspaper to root home routers
Step One: try default passwords. Step Two: Repeat Step One until success
China hacked US Army transport orgs TWENTY TIMES in ONE YEAR
FBI et al knew of nine hacks - but didn't tell TRANSCOM
Microsoft to patch ASP.NET mess even if you don't
We know what's good for you, because we made the mess says Redmond
NORKS ban Wi-Fi and satellite internet at embassies
Crackdown on tardy diplomatic sysadmins providing accidental unfiltered internet access
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL
Discussing the vulnerabilities inherent in Wi-Fi networks, and how using TLS/SSL for your entire site will assure security.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.