Feeds

Verisign Scrooges envisage £4.86bn festive forfeit

Ghost of insecure Christmases past for etailers?

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Online retailers have rubbished claims from the security industry they stand to miss out on billions of pounds of trade this Christmas because of lingering public mistrust in internet transactions.

According to Verisign's 2006 online shopping research, 54 per cent of UK consumers have abandoned a transaction because of security collywobbles. By its reckoning £4.86bn could escape online stores in the run-up to this year's festivities.

The extent of the problem was disputed today by Interactive Media in Retail Group (IMRG) chief executive James Roper. He said: "We won't be missing out on that kind of figure."

The IMRG represents big names in online commerce such as Amazon and Lastminute.com, along with the electronic incarnations of high street perennials Argos and John Lewis.

Roper said: "People have gotten better at online shopping. Credit cards offer excellent protection." He said the IMRG was receiving very few complaints about dodgy online shopping experiences these days.

The IMRG is anticipating another bumper Christmas with the growth of broadband making customer experiences more direct. It said yesterday the industry was growing at £50m per month, and sales of £2.73bn made this October was the best month ever.

Roper said a new wave of investment had come in once the industry recovered from the dot com crash which meant customers had renewed faith in etailers. Twenty-five million Brits will shop for pressies online this Christmas, according to the IMRG.

The research from Verisign is part of a bid to get its "Verisign Secured" seal on more shopping sites, which Verisign reckons would give consumers more confidence. Verisign marketing programs manager Andrew Horbury told us the firm was catching one site a week in Europe displaying a fake security seal graphic. Although it offers the service free to its SSL customers, only a third have taken it up so far.

The firm itself is missing out this Christmas thanks to Microsoft missing its Vista deadlines. The "traffic light" address bar system in IE7, which Verisign hopes to flog a new generation of SSL certificates on the back of, won't be turned on until consumers get their mitts on Vista in January. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Russian hackers exploit 'Sandworm' bug 'to spy on NATO, EU PCs'
Fix imminent from Microsoft for Vista, Server 2008, other stuff
FYI: OS X Yosemite's Spotlight tells Apple EVERYTHING you're looking for
It's on by default – didn't you read the small print?
Microsoft pulls another dodgy patch
Redmond makes a hash of hashing add-on
'LulzSec leader Aush0k' found to be naughty boy not worthy of jail
15 months home detention leaves egg on feds' faces as they grab for more power
Forget passwords, let's use SELFIES, says Obama's cyber tsar
Michael Daniel wants to kill passwords dead
Kill off SSL 3.0 NOW: HTTPS savaged by vicious POODLE
Pull it out ASAP, it is SWISS CHEESE
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.