Feeds

eMusic cuts quotas

Cuts annual subs too

Build a business case: developing custom apps

The No.2 legal music service, eMusic, is cutting the number of tracks Stateside subscribers are permitted to download each month.

The basic monthly allowance falls to 40 from 30 songs (a 25 per cent cut), the Plus allowance falls from 65 to 50 songs (a 23 per cent cut), while the Premium cap is down to 75 songs, from 90 - a 16 per cent cut.

Prices for all three monthly plans remain the same. eMusic is hoping that users of the hit service - it's the fastest-growing rival to iTunes - will upgrade to an annual plan, which are on offer at the moment.

(Subscribers can also buy booster packs.)

"We have a much bigger catalog than we had when we relaunched in 2003 - 1.7m songs as opposed to 250,000 - and the web site is much more sophisticated too," A spokesperson for eMusic in New York told us.

The economics of eMusic is complex. The service depends on the same logic as a health club, acknowledges CEO David Pakman - occasional users subsidize heavy users. If the average number of songs a subscriber downloads increases, there's a significant bottom line impact.

So was eMusic becoming a victim of its own success, we wondered?

"We still offer the best value out of any download service, 25 cents a track," eMusic told us, sidestepping the question. "We're offering people more so we feel can we can charge more for it."

Cuts to the 1-year and 2-year plans suggest eMusic wants to move its loyal customer base onto longer contracts. The price of these plans has been cut as the monthly quotas have been capped. Annual subscriptions range from 40 downloads per month for $124 per year to 90 per month for $244 per year. The top two-year option permits 90 songs per month for $359.82, equivalent to $14.99 a month.

Unlike rival subscription services, eMusic doesn't lock or time-bomb the songs with Digital Rights Management, so customers keep their music unhindered.

eMusic claims 12 per cent of the legal download market, behind Apple's iTunes Store. The new monthly plans take effect from November 17. ®

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
Assange™: Hey world, I'M STILL HERE, ignore that Snowden guy
Press conference: ME ME ME ME ME ME ME (cont'd pg 94)
Premier League wants to PURGE ALL FOOTIE GIFs from social media
Not paying Murdoch? You're gonna get a right LEGALLING - thanks to automated software
Caught red-handed: UK cops, PCSOs, specials behaving badly… on social media
No Mr Fuzz, don't ask a crime victim to be your pal on Facebook
Ballmer quits Microsoft board to spend more time with his b-balls
From Clippy to Clippers: Hi, I see you're running an NBA team now ...
Online tat bazaar eBay coughs to YET ANOTHER outage
Web-based flea market struck dumb by size and scale of fail
Kate Bush: Don't make me HAVE CONTACT with your iPHONE
Can't face sea of wobbling fondle implements. What happened to lighters, eh?
Amazon takes swipe at PayPal, Square with card reader for mobes
Etailer plans to undercut rivals with low transaction fee offer
Call of Duty daddy considers launching own movie studio
Activision Blizzard might like quality control of a CoD film
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.