Feeds

Nvidia rooted by Linux graphics bug

Binary blob malaise

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Updated Security researchers have published an exploit that highlights a long-standing security bug in Nvidia graphic drivers for Linux. Nvidia Driver For Linux v8774 and v8762 are subject to a buffer overflow bug that creates a means for hackers to inject hostile code as root. The bug might be exploited locally or remotely, providing malicious hackers are able to trick users into visiting a maliciously-constructed website.

Nvidia drivers for Solaris and FreeBSD, as well as earlier versions of Nvidia's closed-source Linux driver, are also likely to be vulnerable, according to security firm Rapid7, which published an advisory on the issue on Monday.

Nvidia supplied two graphic drivers for Linux - a closed source "binary blob" driver, which is subject to the vulnerability, and an open source driver, which is not subject to the bug. However, the open source driver lacks the acceleration features found in the closed source driver.

The flaw in the closed source driver stems from a security bug involving the accelerated rendering of text character data (glyphs) that might be used to crash the driver and write arbitrary code into memory that could be subsequently executed.

Rapid7 advises users to switch to the open source driver, included by default within X (X Window System), pending a security fix to its closed source code from Nvidia. News of the exploit is likely to spark debate over the use of binary-only blobs in otherwise open source operating systems.

According to Rapid7, there's been multiple public reports of the bug in Nvidia's closed source Linux driver that has been highlighted on the NVNews forum and elsewhere, dating back two years.

Nvidia publically acknowledged issues in July 2006 but is yet to publish a fix, prompting Rapid7 to release an advisory (complete with proof-of-concept code) as a way of highlighting its concerns.

Rapid7 reckons Nvidia's binary driver is subject to a number of other bugs which might be used to trigger crashes but not capable of being used to inject code, the more serious risk associated with the specific vulnerability it highlights. ®

Update

Reg readers informa us that Nvidia's latest beta driver for linux is (apparently) not affected by this exploit.

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Russian hackers exploit 'Sandworm' bug 'to spy on NATO, EU PCs'
Fix imminent from Microsoft for Vista, Server 2008, other stuff
Microsoft pulls another dodgy patch
Redmond makes a hash of hashing add-on
FYI: OS X Yosemite's Spotlight tells Apple EVERYTHING you're looking for
It's on by default – didn't you read the small print?
'LulzSec leader Aush0k' found to be naughty boy not worthy of jail
15 months home detention leaves egg on feds' faces as they grab for more power
Forget passwords, let's use SELFIES, says Obama's cyber tsar
Michael Daniel wants to kill passwords dead
FBI boss: We don't want a backdoor, we want the front door to phones
Claims it's what the Founding Fathers would have wanted – catching killers and pedos
Kill off SSL 3.0 NOW: HTTPS savaged by vicious POODLE
Pull it out ASAP, it is SWISS CHEESE
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.