Feeds

IBM/Lenovo, Apple top support firm's hardware reliability ratings

Rescuecom survey quite so clear cut?

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

Who makes the most reliable computers? Lenovo, closely followed by Apple, if you believe online service and support company Rescuecom's latest reliability audit, derived from more than 20,000 calls made by the firm's customers during the second quarter this year.

Rescuecom assigned a reliability rating to computer vendors. Lenovo, in its guise as provider of IBM desktops and notebooks, scored 243. Apple attained 201. Third-placed HP/Compaq scored a mere 12. Dell's rating was 4, Gateway -12 and all the rest together scored -16.

What's in a number? According to Rescuecom, the scores factor each vendor's US market share - the data's from Gartner, it said, and covered the last four years - against the number of support calls the company received for each manufacturer's products. The result is a measure of how likely it is to receive a cry of help regarding a given vendor's offering, all other factors - like the fact there are a lot more Dells out there than Macs - being equal.

The higher the score, the less likely Rescuecom reckons it will be to receive a support call concerning that vendor's products - a benchmark, it believes, for the reliability of those products.

Apple, for instance, has a quoted US market share of 4.02 per cent but accounted for only two per cent of Rescuecom support calls. Dell, on the other hand, has a US market share of 17.9 per cent, but accounted for 29.4 per cent of help requests made to Rescuecom. Of the top five vendors, only Gateway kit generated more support calls than the company's market share would suggest.

Of course, Rescuecom focuses on providing IT support to businesses, so it's customer base doesn't necessarily match the demographics of the broader computer technology user base. Apple has a lower Rescuecom support-call likelihood than its market share would suggest, but is that a sign of greater reliability, or a relative paucity of Apple users among Rescuecom's customers? And how will the big battery recalls of Q3 2006 change the scores?

Rescuecom was also quick to claim that even Gateway's reliability is "solid". It said the same of HP and Dell, claiming those vendors' product reliability was merely "potentially less so" than Apple or Lenovo. Which is a bit like saying: Lenovo machines are more reliable than Dell's. Only they might not be... ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
So, Apple won't sell cheap kit? Prepare the iOS garden wall WRECKING BALL
It can throw the low cost race if it looks to the cloud
Samsung Gear S: Quick, LAUNCH IT – before Apple straps on iWatch
Full specs for wrist-mounted device here ... but who'll buy it?
Apple promises to lift Curse of the Drained iPhone 5 Battery
Have you tried turning it off and...? Never mind, here's a replacement
Now that's FIRE WIRE: HP recalls 6 MILLION burn-risk laptop cables
Right in the middle of Burning Mains Man week
HUGE iPAD? Maybe. HUGE ADVERTS? That's for SURE
Noo! Hand not big enough! Don't look at meee!
AMD unveils 'single purpose' graphics card for PC gamers and NO ONE else
Chip maker claims the Radeon R9 285 is 'best in its class'
prev story

Whitepapers

Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Advanced data protection for your virtualized environments
Find a natural fit for optimizing protection for the often resource-constrained data protection process found in virtual environments.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.