Feeds

UK banking websites' security slammed

Frame spoof vulnerabilities rife, warns Heise

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

Several major UK bank websites are subject to security flaws that make it easier for phishing fraudsters to craft more convincing scams, according to a study by Heise Security, a UK arm of the German firm behind c't magazine and German IT portal Heise Online.

Two major banks (NatWest and USB) improved the security of their sites since flaws were detailed by Heise last Friday, but other customer-facing e-banking websites remain vulnerable to frame-spoofing and other types of security attack.

Last Friday, Heise published a number of demos to show how phishing fraudsters might be able to overlay the websites of NatWest, Cahoot, Bank of Scotland, Bank of Ireland, First Direct, and Link with rogue frames, potentially served from websites controlled by fraudsters. The same type of attack is also possible against the website of the Dedicated Cheque and Plastic Crime Unit, a bank-sponsored police unit.

Heise demoed these attacks using default IE6 installs not fitted with security patches, a foolhardy configuration that leaves the door open to all sorts of mischief.

Separately, cross site scripting attacks against the websites of USB and the Bank of England's site were also demonstrated. Frame spoofing attacks can be thwarted providing users are using up to date browser software, but the cross-site scripting attacks it demonstrated can't be addressed by client-side security updates, according to Heise. Both types of attacks require a modicum of skill to carry out, but are far from difficult.

A number of high street banks - including HSBC, Barclays and the Halifax - were not vulnerable to Heise Security's tests. HSBC, for example, uses JavaScript code to check the integrity of the frameset, an approach that thwarts frame spoofing even if a surfer is using out-of-date browser software.

Heise is calling on other UK banks to improve the security of their services. Since documenting its tests, Nat West has made security improvements that means its site is no longer easily susceptible to exploitation. The Bank of England has changed its application to filter user input, so the attack demo by Heise now fails to work. USB has also made security improvements, but portions of its site are still vulnerable to attack, according to Heise. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
SMASH the Bash bug! Apple and Red Hat scramble for patch batches
'Applying multiple security updates is extremely difficult'
Apple's new iPhone 6 vulnerable to last year's TouchID fingerprint hack
But unsophisticated thieves need not attempt this trick
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Who.is does the Harlem Shake
Blame it on LOLing XSS terroristas
Researchers tell black hats: 'YOU'RE SOOO PREDICTABLE'
Want to register that domain? We're way ahead of you.
Stunned by Shellshock Bash bug? Patch all you can – or be punished
UK data watchdog rolls up its sleeves, polishes truncheon
Ello? ello? ello?: Facebook challenger in DDoS KNOCKOUT
Gets back up again after half an hour though
SHELLSHOCKED: Fortune 1000 outfits Bash out batches of patches
CloudPassage points to 'pervasive' threat of Bash bug
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.