Feeds

Integration appliances

The strength of Cast Iron

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Comment Appliances seem to be getting everywhere. One area for their use that I have not previously looked at, are appliances for integration. As far as I know, there are three vendors in this space: BridgeWerx, which is based around Microsoft's BizTalk; Cast Iron Systems; and InfoTone.

Now, as regular readers will know, my primary interest is in data and so I am more interested in data integration than application integration. As a corollary, I am not especially concerned with BridgeWerx as it is clearly focused on application integration only (and specific integrations at that).

I am also less interested in InfoTone, since it is implementing its connectors in hardware as a part of the appliance. The problem with this approach, it seems to me, is that this means that connectivity is likely to be limited and not easily extensible.

Thus, my interest is with Cast Iron Systems. The fact that the company already has a partner in the UK and expects to be making a push into Europe next year only serves to reinforce that interest.

Cast Iron was founded in 2001 and started shipping its first product, known as the "Blue Box" in 2003. Just recently, it has introduced a "Red Box". Put simply, the Blue Box is a hardware appliance on which integration software has already been pre-installed and configured, so that you can "plug-in and go". Connectors at the front and back-ends plug in as required.

The Red Box, on the other hand, has a pre-built Salesforce.com connector already installed at the back-end, so it is simply a question of choosing a connector for your source data. There is an option that supports multiple front-end connectors and you can, of course, have multiple boxes and there is a web-based management console that will monitor your environment across multiple boxes.

Cast Iron, like the other vendors mentioned, is focused on application integration, but I am interested in its wider applicability. In other words, how good is it at data integration, either database to database or application to database, or even database to application?

Certainly, the company has users that employ the software for data integration, though this is typically at table level. Well, transformation and mapping is pretty much like a conventional data integration tool. That is, you drag and drop on a palette. There is also a mapper for flat files and a mapper for when you don't have any metadata. There is also scheduling, and change data capture can be used for real-time purposes.

Where there aren't any facilities are for data governance: there are no profiling, matching or cleansing facilities at all and there are also no facilities for doing such things as impact analysis.

This is arguably less important for application integration and it probably isn't very significant for loading data into Salesforce.com. Moreover, this is not necessarily a deal breaker anyway: there are some elements of profiling that you can build into transformations and you could, after all, do these data quality things separately, either by off-loading them or doing them on the source and target. Nevertheless, this is likely to be off-putting for large enterprises looking at a platform-based approach.

However, Cast Iron isn't targeting large enterprises. Although it has companies like British American Tobacco and Toyota as customers, it is primarily targeting the mid-market. Interestingly, it has also changed its pricing model so that it uses the same subscription-based pricing as Salesforce.com. Thus, an entry level Red Box is $3,000 per month including support. Given that there are no implementation costs whatever, this looks pretty attractive.

To conclude, it is clear that Cast Iron's strength is in application integration and it offers comparable performance to EAI solutions but without the implementation pain. For certain types of data integration tasks companies may make use of Cast Iron, but I suspect that this will be where they are already using one of the company's boxes for application integration.

Copyright © 2006, IT-Analysis.com

Intelligent flash storage arrays

More from The Register

next story
UNIX greybeards threaten Debian fork over systemd plan
'Veteran Unix Admins' fear desktop emphasis is betraying open source
Netscape Navigator - the browser that started it all - turns 20
It was 20 years ago today, Marc Andreeesen taught the band to play
Redmond top man Satya Nadella: 'Microsoft LOVES Linux'
Open-source 'love' fairly runneth over at cloud event
Return of the Jedi – Apache reclaims web server crown
.london, .hamburg and .公司 - that's .com in Chinese - storm the web server charts
Chrome 38's new HTML tag support makes fatties FIT and SKINNIER
First browser to protect networks' bandwith using official spec
Admins! Never mind POODLE, there're NEW OpenSSL bugs to splat
Four new patches for open-source crypto libraries
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.