Feeds

Buyer nailed down for Borland tools biz

Near done deal

Build a business case: developing custom apps

Borland Software has found a buyer for its development tools business, although the company will not - as was expected - take a stake in the new firm.

Borland is expected to announce a deal during the next few weeks having picked a buyer from a shortlist of three candidates narrowed from 10, sources told The Register. The deal is believed to be worth between $100m and $150m.

A spokeswoman for Borland said a deal hadn't been signed but talks were "nearing full completion." Borland's goal has been to wrap up the sale by September.

A deal represents the culmination of five months' worth of work by Borland to balance limited finances with a desire for growth.

The company has chosen to ditch its JBuilder, Delphi, C++ and C# tools, plus a high-performance application server, and dedicate itself to the vogue of helping customers squeeze performance from their existing applications, and of making applications meet business needs in areas like regulatory compliance.

Offloading tools should help Borland focus resources on a single market - enterprise customers and business users - rather than being torn between this group and developers - a constituency that has less individual spending power. The deal will also see Borland focus on engaging with its new customer base using a costly direct sales model.

While Borland has pledged the 300 staff members of DevCo will continue building products like JBuilder and Delphi, it remains to be seen what exactly the new owner has in mind. Additionally, the pressure will be on to turn tools into a profitable business using things like subscriptions and services at a time when licensing revenue on tools is being challenged by the availability of "free" tools like Eclipse, and entrenched high-quality, charged-for products like Microsoft's Visual Studio.

For Borland, the challenge becomes to succeed in a market delineated by well-resourced big names IBM and Computer Associates, and Mercury Interactive - a company which makes up for its lack of size by having a healthy mind share. In an indication of early strategy, Borland has decided to double down on its more profitable regions - UK, France, Germany and the Benelux states - and close down offices in low-spending markets.®

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup

More from The Register

next story
'Stop dissing Google or quit': OK, I quit, says Code Club co-founder
And now a message from our sponsors: 'STFU or else'
Why has the web gone to hell? Market chaos and HUMAN NATURE
Tim Berners-Lee isn't happy, but we should be
Microsoft boots 1,500 dodgy apps from the Windows Store
DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! Naughty, misleading developers!
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
Apple promises to lift Curse of the Drained iPhone 5 Battery
Have you tried turning it off and...? Never mind, here's a replacement
Uber, Lyft and cutting corners: The true face of the Sharing Economy
Casual labour and tired ideas = not really web-tastic
Linux turns 23 and Linus Torvalds celebrates as only he can
No, not with swearing, but by controlling the release cycle
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.