Feeds

Intel yanks 'Tulsa' launch forward

Would like to sell a 4P chip or two

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Intel has pulled forward the release of a server chip meant for four-socket servers, as it desperately tries to catch-up with rival AMD.

Intel today revealed that "Tulsa" will arrive in the third quarter instead of the fourth quarter, as previously forecast. The chip will slot into Intel's MP - multiprocessor - systems that generally have four-sockets. As expected, Tulsa will have a 16MB on-die cache and show up to a 2x performance boost over previous chips.

In addition, Intel confirmed that the "Woodcrest" chip meant for dual-socket and below servers will ship on June 26.

Intel has been forced to do all it can to release a new set of server chips built with the "Core" architecture that shows dramatic performance per watt improvements. Over the past two years, AMD has marched from being a non-entity in the server market to claiming the scalps of IBM, HP, Dell and Sun Microsystems as customers and building out a large server chip business.

AMD has enjoyed particularly high performance gains over Intel in the four-socket server market, so much so that Dell ended its AMD boycott to embrace Opteron in higher-end servers.

To Intel's credit, the Woodcrest chip appears very strong. Customers have been sending El Reg rave reviews of test systems, declaring that AMD's performance edge on many applications has vanished.

Intel's apparent gains have come as a surprise to many - including your reporter - as it was able to make impressive tweaks to its processor designs that seem to have made up for numerous archaic shortcomings. In particular, Intel has avoided a performance penalty on lower-end systems for not having an integrated memory controller by arming its chips with large caches.

Most analysts expect AMD to continue the performance lead with four-socket and above servers due to its more elegant and modern chip architecture. Luckily for Intel, relatively few four-socket servers are shipped every quarter.

Intel has posted a number of Woodcrest benchmarks here. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Xperia Z3: Crikey, Sony – ANOTHER flagship phondleslab?
The Fourth Amendment... and it IS better
Don't wait for that big iPad, order a NEXUS 9 instead, industry little bird says
Google said to debut next big slab, Android L ahead of Apple event
Microsoft to enter the STRUGGLE of the HUMAN WRIST
It's not just a thumb war, it's total digit war
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Netscape Navigator - the browser that started it all - turns 20
It was 20 years ago today, Marc Andreeesen taught the band to play
A drone of one's own: Reg buyers' guide for UAV fanciers
Hardware: Check. Software: Huh? Licence: Licence...?
The Apple launch AS IT HAPPENED: Totally SERIOUS coverage, not for haters
Fandroids, Windows Phone fringe-oids – you wouldn't understand
Apple SILENCES Bose, YANKS headphones from stores
The, er, Beats go on after noise-cancelling spat
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.