Biting the hand that feeds IT
Biting the hand that feeds IT
|
|
Original URL: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/05/12/kodak_spam_fine/
Kodak's online picture sharing service has been fined for promoting its product using junk mail.
Two million messages, sent on behalf of Kodak Imaging Network (formerly Ofoto), failed to include a valid-opt mechanism or a valid physical postal address, as required by law among other violations of the US CAN-SPAM Act.
US regulators at the Federal Trade Commission fined Kodak Imaging Network, the same amount it made from the proceeds of the offending spam campaign. The settlement between the FTC and Kodak Imaging Network prohibits future violations of the CAN-SPAM Act.
The firm also agreed to establish record-keeping and reporting provisions that will allow the agency to monitor compliance with its order. ®
Contrite former spammer touts anti-spam services (5 June 2006)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/05/spammer_turns_against_junk_mail/
Full-up Google choking on web spam? (4 May 2006)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/05/04/google_bigdaddy_chaos/
Renegade spammer targets junk mail registry (3 May 2006)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/05/03/blue_security_backlash/
CAN-SPAM working - FTC (21 December 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12/21/can-spam/
Spam filters thwart junk mail menace (29 November 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/29/ftc_spam_study/
CAN SPAM case upholds email filtering rights (4 August 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/08/04/ut_can_spam_case/
FTC cracks down on email smut barons (25 July 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/25/smut_spam_crackdown/
FTC wants to tweak CAN-SPAM Act (19 May 2005)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/05/19/ftc_consults_on-can-spam_act_tweak/
© Copyright 2008