Feeds

Warner faces 14 download overcharging cases

Stock exchange filing

Build a business case: developing custom apps

Documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday reveal that Warner Music Group is facing 14 separate legal actions relating to the pricing of downloads.

In December last year and February this year the company received requests for information from New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. In late February it received a Civil Investigative Demand as to whether pricing of downloads breaks the Sherman Act.

The filing says Warner has been named in 14 cases - eight in California, five in New York, and one in Washington DC. It expects the cases to be consolidated into one. Although, thanks to iTunes, the US price of 99 cents per track has become an "industry standard", several competition authorities have questioned how this price was arrived at.

The company warns that any legal action, "regardless of the merits of the claim, could be costly and divert the time and resources of management".

The filing says the recorded music industry has had an unstable five years. It says: "The industry-wide decline can be attributed primarily to digital piracy."

Warner is also facing two anti-trust cases filed by independent music labels over its radio promotion behaviour - the company settled an investigation into radio promotion by Attorney General Spitzer in November and paid $5m to charity.

The filing also warned that Warner Music's outside auditors have identified a "material weakness" in the way the company works out domestic royalty payments. The company has started work on integrating different systems in use, but warns that there remains a "remote likelihood that a material misstatement...will not be prevented or detected".

Read the whole filing here.

It also emerged over the weekend that EMI is likely to increase its offer for Warner to $4.4bn and offer a higher percentage of cash. Warner last week rejected EMI's offer of $4.2bn for the company.

More from the Mail on Sunday here.®

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
Kate Bush: Don't make me HAVE CONTACT with your iPHONE
Can't face sea of wobbling fondle implements. What happened to lighters, eh?
Assange™: Hey world, I'M STILL HERE, ignore that Snowden guy
Press conference: ME ME ME ME ME ME ME (cont'd pg 94)
Caught red-handed: UK cops, PCSOs, specials behaving badly… on social media
No Mr Fuzz, don't ask a crime victim to be your pal on Facebook
Ballmer leaves Microsoft board to spend more time with his b-balls
From Clippy to Clippers: Hi, I see you're running an NBA team now ...
Online tat bazaar eBay coughs to YET ANOTHER outage
Web-based flea market struck dumb by size and scale of fail
Amazon takes swipe at PayPal, Square with card reader for mobes
Etailer plans to undercut rivals with low transaction fee offer
Call of Duty daddy considers launching own movie studio
Activision Blizzard might like quality control of a CoD film
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
XBOX One will learn to play media from USB and DLNA sources
Hang on? Aren't those file formats you hardly ever see outside torrents?
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.