Feeds

Nokia staff jacked by Ernst & Young laptop loss

Sun, Cisco, IBM and BP welcome the Finns

Top three mobile application threats

Exclusive When Ernst & Young loses a laptop, it doesn't mess around. The Register has learned that the same missing system with personal information on Sun Microsystems, Cisco, IBM and BP workers also contained data on Nokia's US staff.

A Nokia source notified us that he received a letter from Ernst & Young detailing the accounting firm's loss of his personal information. An Ernst & Young spokesman then confirmed that the laptop was "the same" machine with thousands of Sun, Cisco, IBM and BP staff data, including their ages, social security numbers, tax identification numbers and addresses. Ernst & Young continues to maintain that the laptop poses little risk as it was password protected.

Some rather prominent security folk, however, dispute Ernst & Young's contention. This letter comes from a top security expert at a very, very large technology company. We've agreed to protect his identity.

I am a former Partner of Ernst & Young's Technology & Security Risk Services practice for the Greater China region and was a Senior Manager for the US practice in the same area. I am horrified at what I have read about this rash of laptop losses since all the Big 4 firms have the technical talent and general security knowledge to know that passwords alone are not nearly secure enough and you don't leave laptops with sensitive data lying around anywhere!

While at E&Y we, at least my team, was required to keep sensitive data secure. Never leave laptops around even in the office, use cable locks or lock them in cabinets out of site in addition to using bios passwords and encrypt sensitive data. Why is this data residing on laptops when it can just as easily be controlled on a secure server with secure, authenticated (2 factor) access and full audit trailing?

Finally, when it came to laptop losses in my region of Greater China or in the US, rarely was the theft merely a coincidental theft. Many such thefts are targeted; maybe some further investigation is necessary here.

I confirmed this informally a while back with friends at KPMG and PwC. Every major security journal, yours included, has noted the movement from shotgun style hacker attacks to pin-point ID thefts. Real criminals are getting involved in this very lucrative business and a loose laptop is obviously a prime target. I note that many of these Big 4 pros carry laptops in "Big 4" logo marked laptop bags - hey, why not just put a sign on the bag saying 'likely sensitive data on board, steal me!' My bag is, and always has been, basic black and does not leave my side.

In fact, many of the above Big 4 firms report annually security surveys about precisely these trends in security. At the very least, I would have expected some managing partners of these firms in the US and other partnerships around the world to immediately advise staff of precautions to take with this critically sensitive data and for the partners to be transparent about it.

Isn't that what they are requiring of companies via SOX and other audit requirements related work? Isn't transparency and accountability what they talk about everyday? Why aren't they being held to the same standard they require of all their clients?

Best regards,

[Name Supplied]

The points raised in this letter are key.

Ernst & Young has refused repeated requests to provide more information as to why an employee left this laptop in a place where it could be stolen, and if anyone has been held accountable for the incident or what measures it's taking to prevent future problems. In addition, the company has maintained a code of silence around the incidents, instead of coming forward in a transparent manner as it would have customers do.

Ernst & Young has only admitted to these laptop losses on a case-by-case basis after being confronted by The Register in our string of exclusive stories on this matter. The company was also outed as having lost four more laptops last month in Miami when a police report was made public.

Oddly, no other major publication has reported on the Ernst & Young incidents. The mainstream press, however, rushed to follow on our revelation that Fidelity had lost a laptop containing data on 200,000 HP workers. ®

Combat fraud and increase customer satisfaction

More from The Register

next story
Obama allows NSA to exploit 0-days: report
If the spooks say they need it, they get it
Heartbleed exploit, inoculation, both released
File under 'this is going to hurt you more than it hurts me'
Canadian taxman says hundreds pierced by Heartbleed SSL skewer
900 social insurance numbers nicked, says revenue watchman
German space centre endures cyber attack
Chinese code retrieved but NSA hack not ruled out
Burnt out on patches this month? Oracle's got 104 MORE fixes for you
Mass patch for issues across its software catalog
Reddit users discover iOS malware threat
'Unflod Baby Panda' looks to snatch Apple IDs
Oracle working on at least 13 Heartbleed fixes
Big Red's cloud is safe and Oracle Linux 6 has been patched, but Java has some issues
prev story

Whitepapers

Mainstay ROI - Does application security pay?
In this whitepaper learn how you and your enterprise might benefit from better software security.
Combat fraud and increase customer satisfaction
Based on their experience using HP ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager for IT security operations, Finansbank moved to HP ArcSight ESM for fraud management.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Top three mobile application threats
Learn about three of the top mobile application security threats facing businesses today and recommendations on how to mitigate the risk.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.