Wither Rational?

Not standing still

By David Norfolk, 29th March 2006

I was talking to an ex-Rational manager a week or so ago, who obviously believed that IBM’s enthusiasm for Rational was waning in the face of its success with Eclipse and who also thought that the morale of ex-Rational employees inside IBM was waning.

Well, that POV seemed to come as a surprise to Roger Oberg (Vice President, Rational Marketing and Strategy) when I put it to him. MRDA and all that, but at http://www.ibm.com/annualreport/2005/index.shtml we learn that: “in 2004, the total application development software market grew to more than $3.7bn, and IBM remains the market share leader at nearly 35 per cent, with Microsoft a distant second at 16 per cent…”. IBM also lays claim to “more than 1,200 Rational software developers within IBM. In its earnings report announced January 17, “the Rational division grew four per cent year-over-year contributing to IBM Software Group's $15.8bn in revenues”.

And it isn't as if IBM Rational is standing still. Roger pointed out that we now have Rational Method Composer, which appears to take RUP (Rational Unified Process) beyond software development into the entire application lifecycle.

It seems to let you customise a process to your needs rather than promote “one size fits all”. And there’s Rational Portfolio Manager, a lifecycle IT governance solution which groups projects into groups or portfolios which share resources and contribute to business goals, a considerable improvement in approach over managing individual projects. And, the IBM SOA governance life cycle gives us a context for these and other tools in the current fashionable architecture.

There are more tools (look at the list of SOA development and management tools here) This looks like a rich toolset and a lot of it is still badged Rational. Eclipse is obviously important but it is the implementation technology (and the community) underneath Rational tools. Eclipse is developing, but I think it’s still an IDE (or set of IDE tools) and a long way from being a complete automated application lifecycle process.

Nevertheless, whatever the truth (or the clever marketing), perception is all: what do Reg Developer readers think that IBM is doing with Rational and Eclipse? I am particularly interested in the views of Rational customers. Please comment here – who knows, there might be a round-up article in it…

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

COMMENTS

House Rules Send Corrections

All Reader Comments (1)

Latest Comments

Posted Thursday 6th April 2006 12:22 GMT

Matthieu Chaplin

Not the Innovator it used to be...

I've been using Rational products since 98. At this time, it was a great innovative company, the fact that UML inventors were working for them was probably a determining strength... Anyway, i start to feel a switch in 2002/2003, when products such as MagicDraw started to get real attention.

The iniatial Eclipse-based release of Rose was 'Rationnal XDE' and was absolutely a regression in terms of ergonomy & behavior. More recent releases have proven to be far more stable, (but i'm still looking for a SODA-like plugin) and those times i'm definitely in favor of MagicDraw

Rational ain't what it used to be, the Websphere suite of products is just bloated with marketing