Feeds

AMD grew sales 50 per cent year on year

Spansion factor 'hides' expansion between 2004 and 2005

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

The Essential Guide to IT Transformation

Letters Last week, AMD appeared to have slipped in the world chip rankings, according to numbers provided by market watcher iSuppli. Not so, said AMD. With the inclusion of figures from the spun-out Flash memory division Spansion - absent, we should say, through an error of ours, not iSuppli's - the chip maker's ranking would have been higher. But there's another question raised by the story: is like really being compared with like?

Regarding your story on the new Semi rankings from iSuppli, you're comparing apples and oranges for AMD and, in the process, reporting something that is misleading. Your headline reads, "AMD falls in world chip maker rankings," based on an iSuppli press release that 1) reports that AMD took nearly three percentage points of market share from Intel in 2005 and that 2) doesn't provide an accurate, Apples-to-Apples comparison of our numbers year-over-year. Something here doesn't quite add up. If Intel had spun off half of its business, would you adjust your reporting to consider that? Or would you compare its pre-spinoff numbers from one year to its post spinoff numbers from the following year? Obviously, if you went with the second option and reported that Intel's ranking had fallen without adjusting the numbers for the spinoff, you would be misleading readers. When reporters cover congressional budget issues, they routinely adjust the dollar figures from past years to accommodate the rate of inflation so they can provide a much more meaningful comparison of budget growth over a period of time (apples-to-apples). This is precisely the same thing.

For the record, iSuppli's ranking for AMD in 2004 includes Spansion. Their number for AMD in 2005 doesn't. And while you acknowledge this, you don't provide any meaningful context beyond saying that AMD would have been number eight with Spansion. If you take Spansion out for both years - which would give a much more meaningful, apples-to-apples comparison - you would see that AMD has grown its business by a whopping 50 per cent. In 2004, our revenue without Spansion was $2.6bn. In 2005 without Spansion it was $3.9bn. But the iSuppli numbers compare our $5bn revenue figure from 2004, which includes Spansion, to the 2005 figure of $3.9bn that doesn't include Spansion. Seems to me you should at least fill this hole in for your readers. Even iSuppli's report helps to explain it by giving a little more context. And yet, your story praises Intel for having grown their business by 13 per cent. You might want to at least provide some more balance to your article. At least add in the figures I've cited here to give readers an unobstructed view of all the details, not just some of them, so they can come to their own conclusions.

Eric J DeRitis,
AMD

The Power of One Infographic

More from The Register

next story
Say goodbye to the noughties: Yesterday’s hi-fi biz is BUSTED, bro
Are the days of floorstanders and separates numbered?
LG unfurls flexible SEE-THROUGH 18-inch display
Roll up, roll up for 60-inch telly scrolls by 2017
The final score: Gramophones 1 – Glassholes 0
My life according to a Google Arse
It's finally happened: Bloke builds BOFH-style goofing-off cattle prod
BZZZT: Slapper man seeks funds for jolt-a-slacker device
'Ribbed' for your pleasure: Jony Ive unveils NAKED IPHONE
All-glass mobe could herald the END of traditional cases
iWatch watch: Apple tags sales bod from luxury Swiss watch firm
TAG Heuer retail man pinched for wearables division
IBM's $3bn bet on next-gen computers: Carbon nanotubes, neuro chips
Big Blue exec tells El Reg what to keep an eye on
Military-grade bruiser: Getac F110 rugged tablet... is no iPad
Intel Core i5, 11.6 inches, tough as old boots Windows slab
prev story

Whitepapers

Designing a Defense for Mobile Applications
Learn about the various considerations for defending mobile applications - from the application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
The Power of One Brief: Top reasons to choose HP BladeSystem
Download this brochure to find five ways HP BladeSystem can optimize your business with the power of one.
Securing Web Applications Made Simple and Scalable
Learn how automated security testing can provide a simple and scalable way to protect your web applications.
Top 8 considerations to enable and simplify mobility
In this whitepaper learn how to successfully add mobile capabilities simply and cost effectively.