Feeds

Judge upholds PlayStation controller ruling

Sony's witness not credible, judge says

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Sony Computer Entertainment has lost the latest round in a patent case over a vibrating PlayStation controller, after a Judge refused to accept an argument that Immersion Corporation, the patent owner, had tried to hide crucial information.

According to reports, Judge Claudia Wilken of the US Court for the Northern District of California did not find Sony’s witness, Craig Thorner, to be credible.

The case dates back to 2002 when Immersion, a developer and licensor of what is known as haptic feedback technology, which can be used to make joysticks vibrate in synch with on-screen events, sued Sony, alleging that the PlayStation, PlayStation 2, and associated controllers, accessories and software games that include touch feedback, infringed on two of Immersion's patents.

In September 2004 a jury found in favour of the developer and awarded Immersion $82m in damages. In March 2005 the Court increased the award to $90.7m, to take account of interest due, and issued a permanent injunction against the manufacture, use, sale, or import into the US of the infringing systems. The ban was then stayed pending an appeal.

Sony not only appealed that ruling to a Federal Circuit Court of Appeal, but also filed an appeal with the District Court arguing that Immersion had tried to hide discussions the company had held with inventor Craig Thorner. Thorner had previously developed technology similar to that covered by Immersion’s patents, throwing doubt on the validity of those patents.

But, according to reports, Judge Wilken was not happy with Thorner’s performance as a witness, finding that a payment of $150,000 made by Sony to Thorner was suspect, despite Sony’s explanation that it was an advance royalty payment.

She dismissed the appeal.

The appeal to the Federal Circuit is still ongoing.

Copyright © 2006, OUT-LAW.com

OUT-LAW.COM is part of international law firm Pinsent Masons.

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.