Feeds

Registrars slam dotcom contract

Demand ICANN backtrack on Verisign deal

Business security measures using SSL

Eight of the world's leading registrars have written to ICANN asking it to reject the new dotcom contract for handing too much power and control to incumbent VeriSign.

The heads of GoDaddy, Tucows, Register.com, Network Solutions, Melbourne IT, Intercosmos, BulkRegister and Schlund+Partner, who together represent nearly 60 percent of all internet domains registered by net users, have co-signed the letter [pdf] and urged ICANN chairman Vint Cerf to reject the new contract, despite its recent revision.

"The ICANN Board is poised to make an historic decision... we are writing to voice our deep concerns," the letter begins.

In particular, the registrars state that the seven per cent price increases written into the contract are unjustifiable since the business of registering domains has grown far cheaper in recent years. They also take exception to VeriSign being granted a "presumptive right of renewal" on the dotcom contract, which effectively hands permanent control of all dotcoms to the company.

Instead, they wish to see a "counterbalance" to VeriSign's "unregulated monopoly" in the form of a competitive bid for the dotcom registry when the new contract ends in 2012.

The letter also criticises both ICANN and VeriSign for refusing to release details of the $200m investment that VeriSign is obliged to have provided over the course of the existing contract.

VeriSign says it has invested that amount, ICANN says it is satisfied that it has, but the rest of the world remains sceptical.

The letter is just the latest controversy of the dotcom contract, which initially met a hostile reception at ICANN's Vancouver meeting in November. The overseeing organisation promised to revisit the contract and produced a revised version last month, but the changes made have not satisfied the internet community. ICANN is also being sued by an organisation calling itself the Coalition for ICANN Transparency.

The fear is that since part of the deal for signing the new dotcom contract will be VeriSign dropping its ruinous lawsuits against ICANN, that ICANN is itself compromised and so unlikely to act in the best interests of the internet as a whole.®

Related link

The letter

Reducing the cost and complexity of web vulnerability management

More from The Register

next story
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
JINGS! Microsoft Bing called Scots indyref RIGHT!
Redmond sporran metrics get one in the ten ring
Driving with an Apple Watch could land you with a £100 FINE
Bad news for tech-addicted fanbois behind the wheel
Murdoch to Europe: Inflict MORE PAIN on Google, please
'Platform for piracy' must be punished, or it'll kill us in FIVE YEARS
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Found inside ISIS terror chap's laptop: CELINE DION tunes
REPORT: Stash of terrorist material found in Syria Dell box
Sony says year's losses will be FOUR TIMES DEEPER than thought
Losses of more than $2 BILLION loom over troubled Japanese corp
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL
Discussing the vulnerabilities inherent in Wi-Fi networks, and how using TLS/SSL for your entire site will assure security.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.