Feeds

IBM and Freescale really commit to Power

They're not bitter

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

Spurned by Apple, IBM and Freescale have stunned the technology world by announcing that PC processor technology has become boring and is a dead end. With that in mind, the pair plan to reinvigorate their partnership around the Power processor architecture.

During a joint press conference, Freescale revealed that it has joined IBM's Power.org organization as a founding member. That's a neat trick, as the Power.org "ecosystem" effort was started by IBM back in 2004. Apparently, it just takes the right amount of co-marketing dollars to shift from laggard to founding member.

In addition, IBM and Freescale said they plan to share a common instruction set across all Power market segments, and plan to be more open with roadmaps and shared marketing efforts. Lastly, the two vendors will zero in on advancing Linux for Power.

These moves back up an ongoing effort to put Power chips in everything from supercomputers to automobiles.

"Innovation is no longer centered around the PC," said John Kelly, SVP of technology at IBM, during the press conference.

Such a statement serves as an obvious jab against Apple and its new chip partner, Intel. IBM and Freescale - a spin-off of Motorola - worked as Apple's chip suppliers until losing the company as a customer last year.

Now, the two companies have pledged not to let Intel take over other parts of the processor market, ranging from high-end servers to game consoles, and the embedded segments where Freescale works to produce hardware for networking kit, industrial equipment, media consoles and cars.

The strong Power architecture has proved troubling to Intel - a point not lost on IBM.

Big Blue has been working hard in recent years to drum up support around Power and have the product adopted in a wide range of markets. It allows customers to build their own, proprietary add-ons to the chip, and also fosters the sharing of technology among Power supporters where applicable.

Kelly said this is a huge difference when compared to Intel, which likes to maintain total control over its popular Pentium and Xeon chips.

IBM and Freescale stressed that the really interesting work in processor design is happening away from the PC, and the two vendors have pledged to attack these "compelling" markets together. ®

Remote control for virtualized desktops

More from The Register

next story
Official: European members prefer to fondle Apple iPads
Only 7 of 50 parliamentarians plump for Samsung Galaxy S
Fujitsu CTO: We'll be 3D-printing tech execs in 15 years
Fleshy techie disses network neutrality, helmet-less motorcyclists
Space Commanders rebel as Elite:Dangerous kills offline mode
Frontier cops an epic kicking in its own forums ahead of December revival
Intel's LAME DUCK mobile chips gobbled by CASH COW
Chipzilla won't have money-losing mobe unit to kick about anymore
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Getting started with customer-focused identity management
Learn why identity is a fundamental requirement to digital growth, and how without it there is no way to identify and engage customers in a meaningful way.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
The Heartbleed Bug: how to protect your business with Symantec
What happens when the next Heartbleed (or worse) comes along, and what can you do to weather another chapter in an all-too-familiar string of debilitating attacks?