Feeds
90%
ATI X1900 XTX graphics card

ATI Radeon X1900 XT and XTX

The world's fastest graphics cards?

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Review The smart money says that most other articles on the launch of ATI Radeon X1900 XT and XTX - aka the R580 - will start with chatter about R5xx being late. It's a valid way to kick off the copy on a new ATI high-end GPU product. The delays in getting the silicon into a shipping state - mostly due to a problem in the wafer production that was out of ATI's hands - means that R580 and its associated SKUs are presented barely three months after the R520...

ATI X1900 XTX graphics card

Generally, the major graphics chips companies want to wait at least two quarters before debuting a significantly new high end product, lest they risk pissing off the early adopters of the previous generation, not to mention the board partners who have to sell the things. At the first sniff of something new just around the corner, the knowledgeable crowd with the cash to drop on the flagship part will hold off spending.

The chip companies make no secret of the fact they make huge margins on the high end, almost boutique parts. So while they'll still sell the chips eventually - or at least they cross their collective appendages that they will - they'll do so at a much lower price. First-run silicon is an expensive business, especially when the chip is comparatively big. So they want the Big Pockets™ to splash out - and do so as early as possible.

All that combines to make the timing of the introduction of R580 and the first two SKUs it powers interesting. ATI and its board partners will tell you the X1800 XT, and especially X1800 XL, have sold strongly since their release. We've no doubt they have. But again, good money says there's bound to have been a tail-off in XT sales in recent weeks as information and rumours on R580 have begun to flow.

ATI X1900 XTX graphics card

Things are what they are, though, and we'd rather not dwell too much on the business and industry side of things during a technical evaluation of a new pixel pusher. And what a pixel pusher R580 seems to be. There are significant differences in how the R580 goes about the business of data processing, compared to the R520. Be under no illusions - the R580 is no simple R520 speed bump.

Intelligent flash storage arrays

Next page: The reference board

More from The Register

next story
Xperia Z3: Crikey, Sony – ANOTHER flagship phondleslab?
The Fourth Amendment... and it IS better
Don't wait for that big iPad, order a NEXUS 9 instead, industry little bird says
Google said to debut next big slab, Android L ahead of Apple event
Microsoft to enter the STRUGGLE of the HUMAN WRIST
It's not just a thumb war, it's total digit war
Back to the ... drawing board: 'Hoverboard' will disappoint Marty McFly wannabes
Buzzing board (and some future apps) leave a lot to be desired
A drone of one's own: Reg buyers' guide for UAV fanciers
Hardware: Check. Software: Huh? Licence: Licence...?
The Apple launch AS IT HAPPENED: Totally SERIOUS coverage, not for haters
Fandroids, Windows Phone fringe-oids – you wouldn't understand
Apple SILENCES Bose, YANKS headphones from stores
The, er, Beats go on after noise-cancelling spat
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.