Feeds

Tax man asks to appeal Arctic decision

Mom and Pop IT biz goes back to court over tax

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes

Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs is asking the House of Lords for permission to appeal a decision which could mean lower tax bills for thousands of companies. The decision will affect people who run their own businesses and are mainly paid in dividends rather than salary.

HMRC took Arctic Systems to court because it was unhappy with how it paid tax. Arctic Systems turned over about £100,000 a year. Geoff Jones paid himself a salary of £7,000 a year while his wife was paid £4,000 a year for admin help. Once other expenses were paid the couple split the rest of the cash as a share dividend so paying less in national insurance and other taxes.

The Revenue believes that Diana Jones should pay tax at the same, higher, rate as her husband.

The Professional Contractors Group expressed dismay at the decision. PCG Chairman Simon Juden said: "Geoff and Diana Jones set up their family business in the normal, routine way, as recommended not only by their accountant but also, until very recently, by the Government. The unanimous verdict of three of the most senior judges in the land was that, given that the Joneses shared the burdens and hard work of running their business, they were both entitled to share in the reward."

Juden added: "Appealing to the House of Lords will exacerbate and prolong the uncertainty caused by HMRC’s initial attempt to move the goalposts by changing their interpretation of 1930s legislation and announcing that they were doing so only after the fact."

The PCG said the Revenue should legislate if it wanted to change the rules so dramatically.

The decision is also problematic for couples in similar situations because the deadline for self-assessment is just two weeks away. Radio 4's Moneybox programme recommended people follow the Court of Appeal ruling but make a note on their tax returns that they have done so.

The Jones case is a test case - they won a victory in December last year. More on the Beeb here.®

A new approach to endpoint data protection

More from The Register

next story
Amazon says Hachette should lower ebook prices, pay authors more
Oh yeah ... and a 30% cut for Amazon to seal the deal
Philip K Dick 'Nazi alternate reality' story to be made into TV series
Amazon Studios, Ridley Scott firm to produce The Man in the High Castle
Nintend-OH NO! Sorry, Mario – your profits are in another castle
Red-hatted mascot, red-colored logo, red-stained finance books
Sonos AXES support for Apple's iOS4 and 5
Want to use your iThing? You can't - it's too old
Joe Average isn't worth $10 a year to Mark Zuckerberg
The Social Network deflates the PC resurgence with mobile-only usage prediction
Feel free to BONK on the TUBE, says Transport for London
Plus: Almost NOBODY uses pay-by-bonk on buses - Visa
Twitch rich as Google flicks $1bn hitch switch, claims snitch
Gameplay streaming biz and search king refuse to deny fresh gobble rumors
Stick a 4K in them: Super high-res TVs are DONE
4,000 pixels is niche now... Don't say we didn't warn you
prev story

Whitepapers

7 Elements of Radically Simple OS Migration
Avoid the typical headaches of OS migration during your next project by learning about 7 elements of radically simple OS migration.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
Solving today's distributed Big Data backup challenges
Enable IT efficiency and allow a firm to access and reuse corporate information for competitive advantage, ultimately changing business outcomes.
A new approach to endpoint data protection
What is the best way to ensure comprehensive visibility, management, and control of information on both company-owned and employee-owned devices?