SCO Group is asking a US court to expand its slander case against Novell in a legal move aimed at Novell's SuSE business.

The Linux pariah has accused Novell of copyright infringement through the company's continued distribution of its SuSE Linux, in alleged violation of its license. SCO Group's accusation is predicated on the underlying claim that UnixWare code it says it owns - specifically UnixWare System V code - exist in Linux.

The APA was the deal that saw Novell sell its Unix to the Santa Cruz Operation - aka "oldSCO." SCO Group, or "newSCO", subsequently acquired oldSCO's Unix business and claims copyright as a result.

In its amended filing newSCO has also accused Novell of unfair competition because of its "false claims" of ownership of Unix, "misappropriation" of Unix technology in Linux and "wrongful" attempts by Novell to thwart newSCO's claims of intellectual property ownership.

It's the latest twist in newSCO's two-year legal action against Novell over who exactly owns the UnixWare code. NewSCO launched its case after Novell disputed the company's claim of copyright and patent ownership - brought as a result of newSCO's case against IBM.®

Related stories

• Novell won't pull a SCO (16 August 2007)
• SCO 'disappointed' as shares plunge 70 per cent (13 August 2007)
• Novell owns Unix copyrights after all (11 August 2007)
• SCO punts on Novell bankruptcy claim (17 January 2007)
• SCO shares collapse under weight of ruling (1 December 2006)
• Judge guts SCO claims (30 June 2006)
• SCO spends $4m to make $30k in Q1 (9 March 2006)
• Profits and revenues drop at Novell (6 March 2006)
• Ever talked to SCO? - asks IBM (23 February 2006)
• SCO lodges 'infringing' code with court (1 November 2005)
• SCO moves to limit Smoking Gun Memo damage (15 July 2005)
• SCO knew Linux doesn't infringe - memo (15 July 2005)
• Novell versus SCO will go to court (29 June 2005)
• Analysis SCO, Groklaw and the Monterey mystery that never was (30 April 2005)
• Novell turns the screws on SCO (11 February 2004)